Skip to content
Compare Radnički Niš vs Lausanne

Radnički Niš vs Lausanne Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Radnički Niš vs Lausanne: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Radnički Niš Radnički Niš Home Team
Lausanne Lausanne Away Team
Radnički Niš
36.1
W W L W D L L L L D

Last 10 Matches

Lausanne
33.3
L L L W L W L L W W

Categories Won

7

Radnički Niš

4

Draw

4

Lausanne

Performance Radar

Radnički Niš
Lausanne

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 2D, 5L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Shestyuk (5 goals)
Omar Janneh (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.6

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.2

36.8

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.09

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.01

1.05

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
36.1

Attack: 33.2, Defense: 42.3, Form: 27.2

33.3

Attack: 34.7, Defense: 28.9, Form: 34.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

1
Radnički Niš
Lausanne
Radnički Niš

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 33.2
Defense 42.3
Form 27.2
Consistency 49.3
Lausanne

Power Rating Breakdown

33.3

Overall

Attack 34.7
Defense 28.9
Form 34.7
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

53.2 vs 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Radnički Niš logo Radnički Niš
W
Mladost Lučani (48%)
W
Napredak (34%)
L
FK IMT (63%)
W
Javor (52%)
D
Radnički Krag (57%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)
L
OFK (53%)
L
Red Star (74%)
Lausanne logo Lausanne
L
Servette (70%)
L
Winterthur (46%)
L
Luzern (56%)
W
Zürich (37%)
L
Sion (66%)
W
Winterthur (38%)
L
Luzern (57%)
L
Young Boys (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mladost Lučani H
1 - 0 W
48%
Napredak A
1 - 0 W
34%
FK IMT A
0 - 2 L
63%
Javor H
3 - 2 W
52%
Radnički Krag A
1 - 1 D
57%
Vojvodina A
2 - 3 L
68%
OFK H
1 - 2 L
53%
Red Star A
0 - 2 L
74%
Spartak H
0 - 2 L
28%
Radnik A
2 - 2 D
55%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Servette A
0 - 2 L
70%
Winterthur A
1 - 2 L
46%
Luzern H
1 - 3 L
56%
Zürich H
3 - 0 W
37%
Sion A
0 - 3 L
66%
Winterthur H
2 - 1 W
38%
Luzern A
0 - 4 L
57%
Young Boys H
0 - 2 L
50%
GC Zürich A
3 - 2 W
32%
Zürich A
2 - 1 W
38%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 40.6 vs 36.8), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Radnički Niš averaging 1.1 and Lausanne averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Radnički Niš has the defensive edge, conceding 1.6 per match compared to Lausanne's 2.0.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Radnički Niš

Radnički Niš

VS
Lausanne

Lausanne

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more