Compare Radnički Niš vs Mechelen

Radnički Niš vs Mechelen Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Radnički Niš vs Mechelen: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Radnički Niš Home Team

Mechelen Away Team

Radnički Niš

36.1

W W L W D L L L L D

Last 10 Matches

Mechelen

26.6

L W L L L L D L W L

Categories Won

Radnički Niš

Draw

Mechelen

Performance Radar

Radnički Niš

Mechelen

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-5

-16

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

A. Shestyuk (5 goals)

B. Boersma (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4

Home Win Rate

50%

2W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

17%

1W / 6 matches

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

40.6

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.2

44.7

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 59.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.09

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.01

0.83

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.03

Adjusted Power Rating

36.1

Attack: 33.2, Defense: 42.3, Form: 27.2

26.6

Attack: 25.3, Defense: 18.9, Form: 18.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Radnički Niš

Mechelen

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 33.2

Defense 42.3

Form 27.2

Consistency 49.3

Power Rating Breakdown

26.6

Overall

Attack 25.3

Defense 18.9

Form 18.9

Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

53.2 vs 59.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Radnički Niš

Mechelen

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Mladost Lučani H

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 0 W

48%

Napredak A

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 0 W

34%

FK IMT A

Serbian Super Liga

0 - 2 L

63%

Javor H

Serbian Super Liga

3 - 2 W

52%

Radnički Krag A

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 1 D

57%

Vojvodina A

Serbian Super Liga

2 - 3 L

68%

OFK H

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 2 L

53%

Red Star A

Serbian Super Liga

0 - 2 L

74%

Spartak H

Serbian Super Liga

0 - 2 L

28%

Radnik A

Serbian Super Liga

2 - 2 D

55%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

R. Union SG A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 3 L

69%

Gent H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 0 W

46%

Sint-Truiden H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

44%

Club Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 6 L

71%

Anderlecht H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

35%

R. Union SG H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 1 L

75%

Gent A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 1 D

63%

Club Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 4 L

83%

Anderlecht H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

47%

Gent A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

63%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 40.6 vs 44.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Radnički Niš holds the attacking edge with 1.1 goals per match versus Mechelen's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Radnički Niš has the defensive edge, conceding 1.6 per match compared to Mechelen's 2.4.

Mechelen has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Radnički Niš has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Radnički Niš

Mechelen

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair