Skip to content
Compare Radomiak vs Thun

Radomiak vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Radomiak vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Radomiak Radomiak Home Team
Thun Thun Away Team
Radomiak
49.9
D W W W L D L D L W

Last 10 Matches

Thun
41.4
L L L W L L W W D W

Categories Won

6

Radomiak

4

Draw

5

Thun

Performance Radar

Radomiak
Thun

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Wolski (3 goals)
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
54.0

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 52.0

37.5

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.12

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.08

1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

Adjusted Power Rating
49.9

Attack: 41.6, Defense: 69.3, Form: 41.6

41.4

Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

2
Radomiak
Thun
Radomiak

Power Rating Breakdown

49.9

Overall

Attack 41.6
Defense 69.3
Form 41.6
Consistency 50.5
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 46.7
Defense 43.8
Form 35.0
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

57.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

52.0 vs 51.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Radomiak logo Radomiak
D
Cracovia (45%)
W
Lechia (46%)
W
Wisła Płock (47%)
W
Widzew (54%)
L
Zagłębie (54%)
D
Motor (54%)
L
Piast (58%)
D
Legia (59%)
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (38%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Cracovia A
0 - 0 D
45%
Lechia H
3 - 1 W
46%
Wisła Płock A
1 - 0 W
47%
Widzew H
2 - 1 W
54%
Zagłębie A
0 - 1 L
54%
Motor H
1 - 1 D
54%
Piast A
1 - 3 L
58%
Legia H
1 - 1 D
59%
GKS Katowice H
0 - 1 L
59%
Arka H
3 - 1 W
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
52%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Radomiak has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 54.0) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.5). This means Radomiak's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Thun holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Radomiak's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Radomiak has the defensive edge, conceding 1.0 per match compared to Thun's 1.5.

Radomiak has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Radomiak has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Radomiak

Radomiak

VS
Thun

Thun

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more