Skip to content
Compare Rayo vs NEC

Rayo vs NEC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Rayo vs NEC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Rayo Rayo Home Team
NEC NEC Away Team
Rayo
65.9
D W W W D W L L W W

Last 10 Matches

NEC
56.6
L D D D W D W W L D

Categories Won

7

Rayo

3

Draw

5

NEC

Performance Radar

Rayo
NEC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 2D, 2L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
60%

6 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Alemão (4 goals)
B. Linssen (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
69.4

League Difficulty: 87.0, Opponent Quality: 63.2

67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

Elite Opponent Record
50%

2W / 4 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.74

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.34

2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

Adjusted Power Rating
65.9

Attack: 55.7, Defense: 79.6, Form: 71.6

56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

4
2

31-45'

3
3

46-60'

3
3

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

4
Rayo
NEC
Rayo

Power Rating Breakdown

65.9

Overall

Attack 55.7
Defense 79.6
Form 71.6
Consistency 52.0
NEC

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6
Defense 66.6
Form 35.2
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

87.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

63.2 vs 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

50% vs 50%
Rayo logo Rayo
D
Girona (59%)
W
Strasbourg (57%)
W
Getafe (72%)
W
Strasbourg (52%)
D
Real Sociedad (61%)
W
Espanyol (50%)
L
AEK Athens (75%)
L
Mallorca (73%)
NEC logo NEC
L
Groningen (66%)
D
Telstar (64%)
D
Twente (81%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
W
Excelsior (60%)
D
Heerenveen (67%)
W
PSV (80%)
W
Volendam (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Girona H
1 - 1 D
59%
Strasbourg A
1 - 0 W
57%
Getafe A
2 - 0 W
72%
Strasbourg H
1 - 0 W
52%
Real Sociedad H
3 - 3 D
61%
Espanyol H
1 - 0 W
50%
AEK Athens A
1 - 3 L
75%
Mallorca A
0 - 3 L
73%
AEK Athens H
3 - 0 W
70%
Elche H
1 - 0 W
63%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Groningen A
1 - 2 L
66%
Telstar H
1 - 1 D
64%
Twente A
1 - 1 D
81%
Feyenoord H
1 - 1 D
67%
Excelsior A
2 - 0 W
60%
Heerenveen H
2 - 2 D
67%
PSV A
3 - 2 W
80%
Volendam H
3 - 0 W
49%
Fortuna H
2 - 3 L
56%
Ajax A
1 - 1 D
67%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 69.4 vs 67.5), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

NEC holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Rayo's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Rayo has the defensive edge, conceding 1.0 per match compared to NEC's 1.3.

Rayo has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Rayo has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Rayo

Rayo

VS
NEC

NEC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more