Skip to content
Compare Rijeka vs AGF

Rijeka vs AGF Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Rijeka vs AGF: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Rijeka Rijeka Home Team
AGF AGF Away Team
Rijeka
38.3
W W D L D L W L D L

Last 10 Matches

AGF
52.9
W W D D L D W D D W

Categories Won

2

Rijeka

4

Draw

9

AGF

Performance Radar

Rijeka
AGF

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
20%

2 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Fruk (4 goals)
T. Bech (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
36.5

League Difficulty: 48.3, Opponent Quality: 49.1

52.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.08

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.02

1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
38.3

Attack: 31.7, Defense: 51.9, Form: 25.9

52.9

Attack: 41.0, Defense: 75.1, Form: 41.0

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

2
Rijeka
AGF
Rijeka

Power Rating Breakdown

38.3

Overall

Attack 31.7
Defense 51.9
Form 25.9
Consistency 53.2
AGF

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 41.0
Defense 75.1
Form 41.0
Consistency 63.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

48.3 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

49.1 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Rijeka logo Rijeka
W
Vukovar (32%)
W
Lokomotiva (49%)
D
Hajduk (53%)
L
Varaždin (54%)
D
Dinamo Zagreb (76%)
L
Osijek (40%)
W
Slaven (40%)
L
Gorica (50%)
AGF logo AGF
W
Brøndby (49%)
W
Sønderjyske (43%)
D
Midtjylland (52%)
D
Nordsjælland (60%)
L
Midtjylland (57%)
D
Nordsjælland (55%)
W
Viborg (55%)
D
Brøndby (44%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Vukovar H
3 - 0 W
32%
Lokomotiva A
3 - 0 W
49%
Hajduk H
0 - 0 D
53%
Varaždin A
0 - 1 L
54%
Dinamo Zagreb A
2 - 2 D
76%
Osijek H
0 - 2 L
40%
Slaven A
2 - 0 W
40%
Gorica A
0 - 4 L
50%
Strasbourg A
1 - 1 D
57%
Istra H
0 - 2 L
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brøndby A
2 - 0 W
49%
Sønderjyske H
2 - 1 W
43%
Midtjylland H
0 - 0 D
52%
Nordsjælland A
1 - 1 D
60%
Midtjylland A
1 - 2 L
57%
Nordsjælland H
1 - 1 D
55%
Viborg A
2 - 1 W
55%
Brøndby H
0 - 0 D
44%
Sønderjyske A
1 - 1 D
48%
Vejle A
2 - 1 W
44%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

AGF has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 52.4) compared to Rijeka (SoS: 36.5). This means AGF's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Rijeka averaging 1.1 and AGF averaging 1.2 goals per match.

AGF has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Rijeka's 1.2.

AGF has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.1 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

AGF has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Rijeka

Rijeka

VS
AGF

AGF

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more