Compare Rijeka vs Midtjylland

Rijeka vs Midtjylland Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Rijeka vs Midtjylland: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Rijeka Home Team

Midtjylland Away Team

Rijeka

38.3

W W D L D L W L D L

Last 10 Matches

Midtjylland

43.7

D D D W W W D D L L

Categories Won

Rijeka

Draw

Midtjylland

Performance Radar

Rijeka

Midtjylland

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-1

Clean Sheet

40%

4 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

20%

2 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

T. Fruk (4 goals)

M. Erlić (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 6

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9

Home Win Rate

25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

33%

2W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

36.5

League Difficulty: 48.3, Opponent Quality: 49.1

42.6

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.08

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.02

1.36

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.06

Adjusted Power Rating

38.3

Attack: 31.7, Defense: 51.9, Form: 25.9

43.7

Attack: 40.1, Defense: 55.6, Form: 27.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Rijeka

Midtjylland

Power Rating Breakdown

38.3

Overall

Attack 31.7

Defense 51.9

Form 25.9

Consistency 53.2

Power Rating Breakdown

43.7

Overall

Attack 40.1

Defense 55.6

Form 27.8

Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

48.3 vs 58.0

Opponent Quality

49.1 vs 55.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Rijeka

Midtjylland

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Vukovar H

Croatia Prva HNL

3 - 0 W

32%

Lokomotiva A

Croatia Prva HNL

3 - 0 W

49%

Hajduk H

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 0 D

53%

Varaždin A

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 1 L

54%

Dinamo Zagreb A

Croatia Prva HNL

2 - 2 D

76%

Osijek H

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 2 L

40%

Slaven A

Croatia Prva HNL

2 - 0 W

40%

Gorica A

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 4 L

50%

Strasbourg A

UEFA Conference League

1 - 1 D

57%

Istra H

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 2 L

40%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Nordsjælland A

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

60%

Viborg H

Danish Superligaen

3 - 3 D

50%

AGF A

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

62%

Sønderjyske A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

48%

AGF H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

57%

Brøndby A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

49%

Sønderjyske H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 2 D

43%

Viborg A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

55%

Nottm Forest H

UEFA Europa League

1 - 2 L

76%

Nordsjælland H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 1 L

55%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 36.5 vs 42.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Rijeka averaging 1.1 and Midtjylland averaging 1.3 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Rijeka conceding 1.2 and Midtjylland conceding 1.2 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.4 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Midtjylland has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Rijeka

Midtjylland

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair