Compare Rize vs GAK

Rize vs GAK Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Rize vs GAK: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Rize Home Team

GAK Away Team

Rize

49.0

L W L D W W L L W W

Last 10 Matches

GAK

52.1

D W L L D L W W W L

Categories Won

Rize

Draw

GAK

Performance Radar

Rize

GAK

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match

1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

Q. Laçi (4 goals)

R. Harakaté (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11

Home Win Rate

100%

4W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

17%

1W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

49.3

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 58.6

51.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 48.8

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.82

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.22

1.66

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating

49.0

Attack: 53.0, Defense: 49.6, Form: 49.6

52.1

Attack: 57.4, Defense: 64.2, Form: 40.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Rize

GAK

Power Rating Breakdown

49.0

Overall

Attack 53.0

Defense 49.6

Form 49.6

Consistency 38.8

Power Rating Breakdown

52.1

Overall

Attack 57.4

Defense 64.2

Form 40.5

Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

58.6 vs 48.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Rize

GAK

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Eyüp A

Turkish Super Lig

0 - 4 L

58%

Konyaspor H

Turkish Super Lig

3 - 2 W

61%

Kayseri A

Turkish Super Lig

0 - 2 L

49%

Fenerbahçe A

Turkish Super Lig

2 - 2 D

73%

Gaziantep H

Turkish Super Lig

2 - 1 W

49%

Samsunspor H

Turkish Super Lig

4 - 1 W

62%

Fatih A

Turkish Super Lig

1 - 2 L

60%

Trabzonspor A

Turkish Super Lig

0 - 1 L

74%

Antalyaspor H

Turkish Super Lig

1 - 0 W

43%

Kasımpaşa A

Turkish Super Lig

3 - 0 W

57%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Altach H

Austrian Bundesliga

2 - 2 D

43%

WSG Tirol H

Austrian Bundesliga

4 - 0 W

44%

WAC A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 1 L

51%

Ried A

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 2 L

55%

Ried H

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 1 D

50%

Altach A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 1 L

48%

BW Linz H

Austrian Bundesliga

2 - 1 W

55%

WSG Tirol A

Austrian Bundesliga

5 - 1 W

48%

WAC H

Austrian Bundesliga

2 - 0 W

46%

WSG Tirol A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 2 L

48%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.3 vs 51.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Rize averaging 1.6 and GAK averaging 1.7 goals per match.

GAK has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Rize's 1.5.

GAK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors Rize, who boasts a 100% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Rize

GAK

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair