Skip to content
Compare Rize vs Jagiellonia

Rize vs Jagiellonia Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Rize vs Jagiellonia: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Rize Rize Home Team
Jagiellonia Jagiellonia Away Team
Rize
49.0
L W L D W W L L W W

Last 10 Matches

Jagiellonia
45.0
W L W D D L W L L D

Categories Won

6

Rize

5

Draw

4

Jagiellonia

Performance Radar

Rize
Jagiellonia

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 1D, 4L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-1

-1

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Q. Laçi (4 goals)
A. Pululu (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
100%

4W / 4 matches

29%

2W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.3

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 58.6

54.4

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 52.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.82

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.22

1.23

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.17

Adjusted Power Rating
49.0

Attack: 53.0, Defense: 49.6, Form: 49.6

45.0

Attack: 48.7, Defense: 52.2, Form: 31.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
2

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

3
5

46-60'

2

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

3
Rize
Jagiellonia
Rize

Power Rating Breakdown

49.0

Overall

Attack 53.0
Defense 49.6
Form 49.6
Consistency 38.8
Jagiellonia

Power Rating Breakdown

45.0

Overall

Attack 48.7
Defense 52.2
Form 31.3
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.0 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

58.6 vs 52.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Rize logo Rize
L
Eyüp (58%)
W
Konyaspor (61%)
L
Kayseri (49%)
D
Fenerbahçe (73%)
W
Gaziantep (49%)
W
Samsunspor (62%)
L
Fatih (60%)
L
Trabzonspor (74%)
Jagiellonia logo Jagiellonia
W
Pogoń (49%)
L
Górnik (53%)
W
Arka (49%)
D
Kielce (48%)
D
Lech (64%)
L
Wisła Płock (42%)
W
GKS Katowice (59%)
L
Piast (53%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Eyüp A
0 - 4 L
58%
Konyaspor H
3 - 2 W
61%
Kayseri A
0 - 2 L
49%
Fenerbahçe A
2 - 2 D
73%
Gaziantep H
2 - 1 W
49%
Samsunspor H
4 - 1 W
62%
Fatih A
1 - 2 L
60%
Trabzonspor A
0 - 1 L
74%
Antalyaspor H
1 - 0 W
43%
Kasımpaşa A
3 - 0 W
57%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pogoń H
3 - 2 W
49%
Górnik H
1 - 2 L
53%
Arka A
3 - 0 W
49%
Kielce A
1 - 1 D
48%
Lech H
0 - 0 D
64%
Wisła Płock H
1 - 2 L
42%
GKS Katowice H
2 - 1 W
59%
Piast H
1 - 2 L
53%
Lechia A
0 - 3 L
51%
Legia H
2 - 2 D
59%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.3 vs 54.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Rize averaging 1.6 and Jagiellonia averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Rize conceding 1.5 and Jagiellonia conceding 1.5 per match.

Jagiellonia has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors Rize, who boasts a 100% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Rize

Rize

VS
Jagiellonia

Jagiellonia

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more