Compare Rize vs Westerlo

Rize vs Westerlo Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Rize vs Westerlo: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Rize Home Team

Westerlo Away Team

Rize

49.0

L W L D W W L L W W

Last 10 Matches

Westerlo

45.7

L D L W L W W D L W

Categories Won

Rize

Draw

Westerlo

Performance Radar

Rize

Westerlo

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match

1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-1

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

Q. Laçi (4 goals)

Nacho Ferri (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 11

Home Win Rate

100%

4W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

17%

1W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

49.3

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 58.6

51.3

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 54.9

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.82

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.22

1.42

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating

49.0

Attack: 53.0, Defense: 49.6, Form: 49.6

45.7

Attack: 47.3, Defense: 50.6, Form: 40.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Rize

Westerlo

Power Rating Breakdown

49.0

Overall

Attack 53.0

Defense 49.6

Form 49.6

Consistency 38.8

Power Rating Breakdown

45.7

Overall

Attack 47.3

Defense 50.6

Form 40.5

Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

58.6 vs 54.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 33%

Rize

Westerlo

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Eyüp A

Turkish Super Lig

0 - 4 L

58%

Konyaspor H

Turkish Super Lig

3 - 2 W

61%

Kayseri A

Turkish Super Lig

0 - 2 L

49%

Fenerbahçe A

Turkish Super Lig

2 - 2 D

73%

Gaziantep H

Turkish Super Lig

2 - 1 W

49%

Samsunspor H

Turkish Super Lig

4 - 1 W

62%

Fatih A

Turkish Super Lig

1 - 2 L

60%

Trabzonspor A

Turkish Super Lig

0 - 1 L

74%

Antalyaspor H

Turkish Super Lig

1 - 0 W

43%

Kasımpaşa A

Turkish Super Lig

3 - 0 W

57%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Genk A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 3 L

54%

OHL H

Belgian First Division A

3 - 3 D

35%

Antwerp H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 4 L

40%

OHL A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

40%

Genk H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

49%

Standard A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

72%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 0 W

57%

Standard A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

72%

Club Brugge H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

78%

OHL A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

52%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.3 vs 51.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Rize averaging 1.6 and Westerlo averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Rize conceding 1.5 and Westerlo conceding 1.5 per match.

Westerlo has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

The home advantage factor favors Rize, who boasts a 100% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Westerlo is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Rize

Westerlo

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair