Compare Roma vs Dender

Roma vs Dender Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Roma vs Dender: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Roma Home Team

Dender Away Team

Roma

59.0

W W W D W L W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Dender

33.6

L W L L L W L L D D

Categories Won

Roma

Draw

Dender

Performance Radar

Roma

Dender

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

2.1

21 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-8

Clean Sheet

40%

4 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

D. Malen (8 goals)

D. Hrnčár (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 12 / 2nd Half: 9

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3

Home Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

57.5

League Difficulty: 89.0, Opponent Quality: 62.5

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

2.67

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: -0.57

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

Adjusted Power Rating

59.0

Attack: 75.2, Defense: 53.8, Form: 53.8

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Roma

Dender

Power Rating Breakdown

59.0

Overall

Attack 75.2

Defense 53.8

Form 53.8

Consistency 45.7

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 38.0

Form 19.0

Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

89.0 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

62.5 vs 57.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Roma

Dender

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Parma A

Italian Serie A

3 - 2 W

62%

Fiorentina H

Italian Serie A

4 - 0 W

66%

Bologna A

Italian Serie A

2 - 0 W

63%

Atalanta H

Italian Serie A

1 - 1 D

64%

Pisa H

Italian Serie A

3 - 0 W

40%

Inter Milan A

Italian Serie A

2 - 5 L

84%

Lecce H

Italian Serie A

1 - 0 W

53%

Bologna H

UEFA Europa League

3 - 4 L

56%

Como A

Italian Serie A

1 - 2 L

76%

Bologna A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 1 D

61%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

ZW A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

59%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

38%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

46%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

65%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

54%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

58%

R. Union SG A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

80%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

57%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

63%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Roma has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 57.5) compared to Dender (SoS: 44.9). This means Roma's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Roma's attack is on another level, averaging 2.1 goals per match with D. Malen leading the charge with 8 goals. Dender manages just 1.0 per match.

Roma has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Dender's 1.8.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Roma emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (59.0 vs 33.6) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Roma

Dender

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair