Compare Roma vs Genk

Roma vs Genk Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Roma vs Genk: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Roma Home Team

Genk Away Team

Roma

59.0

W W W D W L W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Genk

50.6

W L D D W D W D L W

Categories Won

Roma

Draw

Genk

Performance Radar

Roma

Genk

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

2.1

21 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

D. Malen (8 goals)

A. Bibout (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 12 / 2nd Half: 9

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10

Home Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

57.5

League Difficulty: 89.0, Opponent Quality: 62.5

56.0

League Difficulty: 60.6, Opponent Quality: 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

2.67

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: -0.57

1.53

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

59.0

Attack: 75.2, Defense: 53.8, Form: 53.8

50.6

Attack: 56.5, Defense: 49.5, Form: 42.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Roma

Genk

Power Rating Breakdown

59.0

Overall

Attack 75.2

Defense 53.8

Form 53.8

Consistency 45.7

Power Rating Breakdown

50.6

Overall

Attack 56.5

Defense 49.5

Form 42.4

Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

89.0 vs 60.6

Opponent Quality

62.5 vs 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Roma

Genk

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Parma A

Italian Serie A

3 - 2 W

62%

Fiorentina H

Italian Serie A

4 - 0 W

66%

Bologna A

Italian Serie A

2 - 0 W

63%

Atalanta H

Italian Serie A

1 - 1 D

64%

Pisa H

Italian Serie A

3 - 0 W

40%

Inter Milan A

Italian Serie A

2 - 5 L

84%

Lecce H

Italian Serie A

1 - 0 W

53%

Bologna H

UEFA Europa League

3 - 4 L

56%

Como A

Italian Serie A

1 - 2 L

76%

Bologna A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 1 D

61%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Westerlo H

Belgian First Division A

3 - 0 W

45%

Charleroi A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 2 L

51%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

55%

Charleroi H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

46%

Westerlo A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

50%

OHL H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

47%

Antwerp A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

57%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

5 - 5 D

54%

Freiburg A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 5 L

69%

Sint-Truiden H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

55%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 57.5 vs 56.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Roma holds the attacking edge with 2.1 goals per match versus Genk's 1.6, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Roma conceding 1.5 and Genk conceding 1.6 per match.

Genk has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Roma has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Roma

Genk

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair