Skip to content
Compare Liberec vs Cremonese

Liberec vs Cremonese Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Liberec vs Cremonese: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Liberec Liberec Home Team
Cremonese Cremonese Away Team
Liberec
35.3
L L W D L W D D L L

Last 10 Matches

Cremonese
36.5
W L L D L L W L L L

Categories Won

4

Liberec

3

Draw

8

Cremonese

Performance Radar

Liberec
Cremonese

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
0.7

7 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Krollis (3 goals)
F. Bonazzoli (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
43.4

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 57.6

57.7

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 62.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.75

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.05

1.12

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.22

Adjusted Power Rating
35.3

Attack: 21.8, Defense: 56.0, Form: 18.7

36.5

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 46.7, Form: 21.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

2
Liberec
Cremonese
Liberec

Power Rating Breakdown

35.3

Overall

Attack 21.8
Defense 56.0
Form 18.7
Consistency 61.3
Cremonese

Power Rating Breakdown

36.5

Overall

Attack 32.3
Defense 46.7
Form 21.5
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 90.0

Opponent Quality

57.6 vs 62.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Liberec logo Liberec
L
Plzeň (64%)
L
Slavia Prague (69%)
W
Jablonec (49%)
D
Ml. Boleslav (61%)
L
Karviná (48%)
W
Slovácko (45%)
D
Teplice (49%)
D
Bohemians (58%)
Cremonese logo Cremonese
W
Pisa (40%)
L
Lazio (70%)
L
Napoli (79%)
D
Torino (69%)
L
Cagliari (58%)
L
Bologna (58%)
W
Parma (62%)
L
Fiorentina (66%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Plzeň A
0 - 2 L
64%
Slavia Prague H
1 - 2 L
69%
Jablonec A
2 - 1 W
49%
Ml. Boleslav H
0 - 0 D
61%
Karviná A
1 - 3 L
48%
Slovácko H
2 - 1 W
45%
Teplice H
1 - 1 D
49%
Bohemians A
0 - 0 D
58%
Hradec Kr. H
0 - 1 L
59%
Slavia Prague A
0 - 1 L
74%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pisa H
3 - 0 W
40%
Lazio H
1 - 2 L
70%
Napoli A
0 - 4 L
79%
Torino H
0 - 0 D
69%
Cagliari A
0 - 1 L
58%
Bologna H
1 - 2 L
58%
Parma A
2 - 0 W
62%
Fiorentina H
1 - 4 L
66%
Lecce A
1 - 2 L
58%
AC Milan H
0 - 2 L
60%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Cremonese has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 57.7) compared to Liberec (SoS: 43.4). This means Cremonese's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Liberec averaging 0.7 and Cremonese averaging 0.9 goals per match.

Liberec has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Cremonese's 1.7.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.2 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Liberec

Liberec

VS
Cremonese

Cremonese

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more