Skip to content
Compare Liberec vs Lausanne

Liberec vs Lausanne Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Liberec vs Lausanne: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Liberec Liberec Home Team
Lausanne Lausanne Away Team
Liberec
35.3
L L W D L W D D L L

Last 10 Matches

Lausanne
33.3
L L L W L W L L W W

Categories Won

5

Liberec

4

Draw

6

Lausanne

Performance Radar

Liberec
Lausanne

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
0.7

7 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Krollis (3 goals)
Omar Janneh (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
43.4

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 57.6

36.8

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.75

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.05

1.05

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
35.3

Attack: 21.8, Defense: 56.0, Form: 18.7

33.3

Attack: 34.7, Defense: 28.9, Form: 34.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

1
Liberec
Lausanne
Liberec

Power Rating Breakdown

35.3

Overall

Attack 21.8
Defense 56.0
Form 18.7
Consistency 61.3
Lausanne

Power Rating Breakdown

33.3

Overall

Attack 34.7
Defense 28.9
Form 34.7
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

57.6 vs 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Liberec logo Liberec
L
Plzeň (64%)
L
Slavia Prague (69%)
W
Jablonec (49%)
D
Ml. Boleslav (61%)
L
Karviná (48%)
W
Slovácko (45%)
D
Teplice (49%)
D
Bohemians (58%)
Lausanne logo Lausanne
L
Servette (70%)
L
Winterthur (46%)
L
Luzern (56%)
W
Zürich (37%)
L
Sion (66%)
W
Winterthur (38%)
L
Luzern (57%)
L
Young Boys (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Plzeň A
0 - 2 L
64%
Slavia Prague H
1 - 2 L
69%
Jablonec A
2 - 1 W
49%
Ml. Boleslav H
0 - 0 D
61%
Karviná A
1 - 3 L
48%
Slovácko H
2 - 1 W
45%
Teplice H
1 - 1 D
49%
Bohemians A
0 - 0 D
58%
Hradec Kr. H
0 - 1 L
59%
Slavia Prague A
0 - 1 L
74%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Servette A
0 - 2 L
70%
Winterthur A
1 - 2 L
46%
Luzern H
1 - 3 L
56%
Zürich H
3 - 0 W
37%
Sion A
0 - 3 L
66%
Winterthur H
2 - 1 W
38%
Luzern A
0 - 4 L
57%
Young Boys H
0 - 2 L
50%
GC Zürich A
3 - 2 W
32%
Zürich A
2 - 1 W
38%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 43.4 vs 36.8), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Lausanne holds the attacking edge with 1.2 goals per match versus Liberec's 0.7, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Liberec is far superior, conceding just 1.2 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Lausanne leaks 2.0 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Liberec

Liberec

VS
Lausanne

Lausanne

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more