Skip to content
Compare Liberec vs Tromsø

Liberec vs Tromsø Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Liberec vs Tromsø: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Liberec Liberec Home Team
Tromsø Tromsø Away Team
Liberec
35.3
L L W D L W D D L L

Last 10 Matches

Tromsø
64.8
W D L W W D W W W W

Categories Won

1

Liberec

3

Draw

11

Tromsø

Performance Radar

Liberec
Tromsø

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

70%

7W, 2D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
0.7

7 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

+9

+9

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Krollis (3 goals)
J. Hjertø-Dahl (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

71%

5W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
43.4

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 57.6

48.0

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 46.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.75

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.05

1.56

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
35.3

Attack: 21.8, Defense: 56.0, Form: 18.7

64.8

Attack: 55.5, Defense: 71.9, Form: 68.6

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

5
1

61-75'

3
1

76-90+'

3
Liberec
Tromsø
Liberec

Power Rating Breakdown

35.3

Overall

Attack 21.8
Defense 56.0
Form 18.7
Consistency 61.3
Tromsø

Power Rating Breakdown

64.8

Overall

Attack 55.5
Defense 71.9
Form 68.6
Consistency 63.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

57.6 vs 46.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Liberec logo Liberec
L
Plzeň (64%)
L
Slavia Prague (69%)
W
Jablonec (49%)
D
Ml. Boleslav (61%)
L
Karviná (48%)
W
Slovácko (45%)
D
Teplice (49%)
D
Bohemians (58%)
Tromsø logo Tromsø
W
Molde (52%)
D
Start (40%)
L
Brann (45%)
W
Sandefjord (50%)
W
Sarpsborg (47%)
D
Lillestrøm (57%)
W
Kristiansund (45%)
W
Rosenborg (42%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Plzeň A
0 - 2 L
64%
Slavia Prague H
1 - 2 L
69%
Jablonec A
2 - 1 W
49%
Ml. Boleslav H
0 - 0 D
61%
Karviná A
1 - 3 L
48%
Slovácko H
2 - 1 W
45%
Teplice H
1 - 1 D
49%
Bohemians A
0 - 0 D
58%
Hradec Kr. H
0 - 1 L
59%
Slavia Prague A
0 - 1 L
74%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Molde H
2 - 0 W
52%
Start A
1 - 1 D
40%
Brann H
0 - 5 L
45%
Sandefjord H
3 - 1 W
50%
Sarpsborg A
1 - 0 W
47%
Lillestrøm H
0 - 0 D
57%
Kristiansund H
2 - 0 W
45%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
42%
Brann A
2 - 1 W
50%
Fredrikstad H
4 - 0 W
39%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 43.4 vs 48.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Tromsø's attack is on another level, averaging 1.7 goals per match with J. Hjertø-Dahl leading the charge with 5 goals. Liberec manages just 0.7 per match.

Tromsø has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Liberec's 1.2.

Tromsø has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Tromsø is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.2 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Tromsø emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (64.8 vs 35.3) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Liberec

Liberec

VS
Tromsø

Tromsø

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more