Compare Liberec vs Westerlo

Liberec vs Westerlo Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Liberec vs Westerlo: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Liberec Home Team

Westerlo Away Team

Liberec

35.3

L L W D L W D D L L

Last 10 Matches

Westerlo

45.7

L D L W L W W D L W

Categories Won

Liberec

Draw

Westerlo

Performance Radar

Liberec

Westerlo

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match

0.7

7 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-5

-1

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

R. Krollis (3 goals)

Nacho Ferri (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 4

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 11

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

43.4

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 57.6

51.3

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 54.9

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

0.75

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.05

1.42

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating

35.3

Attack: 21.8, Defense: 56.0, Form: 18.7

45.7

Attack: 47.3, Defense: 50.6, Form: 40.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Liberec

Westerlo

Power Rating Breakdown

35.3

Overall

Attack 21.8

Defense 56.0

Form 18.7

Consistency 61.3

Power Rating Breakdown

45.7

Overall

Attack 47.3

Defense 50.6

Form 40.5

Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

57.6 vs 54.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 33%

Liberec

Westerlo

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Plzeň A

Czech First League

0 - 2 L

64%

Slavia Prague H

Czech First League

1 - 2 L

69%

Jablonec A

Czech First League

2 - 1 W

49%

Ml. Boleslav H

Czech First League

0 - 0 D

61%

Karviná A

Czech First League

1 - 3 L

48%

Slovácko H

Czech First League

2 - 1 W

45%

Teplice H

Czech First League

1 - 1 D

49%

Bohemians A

Czech First League

0 - 0 D

58%

Hradec Kr. H

Czech First League

0 - 1 L

59%

Slavia Prague A

Czech First League

0 - 1 L

74%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Genk A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 3 L

54%

OHL H

Belgian First Division A

3 - 3 D

35%

Antwerp H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 4 L

40%

OHL A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

40%

Genk H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

49%

Standard A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

72%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 0 W

57%

Standard A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

72%

Club Brugge H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

78%

OHL A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

52%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 43.4 vs 51.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Westerlo holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus Liberec's 0.7, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Liberec has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Westerlo's 1.5.

Westerlo has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Westerlo is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.4 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Westerlo has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Liberec

Westerlo

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair