Skip to content
Compare Sparta vs Tondela

Sparta vs Tondela Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Sparta vs Tondela: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Sparta Sparta Home Team
Tondela Tondela Away Team
Sparta
29.8
L D L L D W L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Tondela
37.0
W W D L L D L D L D

Categories Won

6

Sparta

2

Draw

7

Tondela

Performance Radar

Sparta
Tondela

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 3D, 6L

20%

2W, 4D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-14

-14

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Zonneveld (3 goals)
Rony Lopes (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.1

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.9

52.7

League Difficulty: 79.0, Opponent Quality: 60.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.98

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.18

0.92

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
29.8

Attack: 28.0, Defense: 28.0, Form: 10.5

37.0

Attack: 30.8, Defense: 47.9, Form: 20.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

2

46-60'

2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

3
Sparta
Tondela
Sparta

Power Rating Breakdown

29.8

Overall

Attack 28.0
Defense 28.0
Form 10.5
Consistency 74.8
Tondela

Power Rating Breakdown

37.0

Overall

Attack 30.8
Defense 47.9
Form 20.5
Consistency 64.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 79.0

Opponent Quality

65.9 vs 60.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Sparta logo Sparta
L
Twente (81%)
D
Go Ahead (66%)
L
Telstar (69%)
L
PSV (75%)
D
NAC (54%)
W
Volendam (49%)
L
Ajax (67%)
D
Zwolle (54%)
Tondela logo Tondela
W
Moreirense (50%)
W
Casa Pia (53%)
D
Sporting (75%)
L
Nacional (52%)
L
Porto (74%)
D
Gil Vicente (55%)
L
Vitória SC (59%)
D
AVS (59%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Twente A
0 - 4 L
81%
Go Ahead H
2 - 2 D
66%
Telstar A
1 - 4 L
69%
PSV H
0 - 2 L
75%
NAC A
0 - 0 D
54%
Volendam H
2 - 0 W
49%
Ajax A
0 - 4 L
67%
Zwolle H
1 - 1 D
54%
Heerenveen A
1 - 2 L
72%
AZ A
1 - 3 L
72%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Moreirense H
2 - 0 W
50%
Casa Pia A
1 - 0 W
53%
Sporting A
2 - 2 D
75%
Nacional H
0 - 2 L
52%
Porto A
0 - 2 L
74%
Gil Vicente H
2 - 2 D
55%
Vitória SC A
0 - 5 L
59%
AVS H
0 - 0 D
59%
Rio Ave H
0 - 1 L
61%
Santa Clara H
2 - 2 D
66%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.1 vs 52.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Sparta averaging 0.8 and Tondela averaging 0.9 goals per match.

Tondela has the defensive edge, conceding 1.6 per match compared to Sparta's 2.2.

Sparta has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Tondela has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Sparta

Sparta

VS
Tondela

Tondela

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more