Skip to content
Compare Charleroi vs Cremonese

Charleroi vs Cremonese Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Charleroi vs Cremonese: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Charleroi Charleroi Home Team
Cremonese Cremonese Away Team
Charleroi
42.5
W W W D L W L L L D

Last 10 Matches

Cremonese
36.5
W L L D L L W L L L

Categories Won

7

Charleroi

4

Draw

4

Cremonese

Performance Radar

Charleroi
Cremonese

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Bernier (3 goals)
F. Bonazzoli (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.2

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 52.5

57.7

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 62.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.03

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.07

1.12

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.22

Adjusted Power Rating
42.5

Attack: 33.8, Defense: 58.4, Form: 36.9

36.5

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 46.7, Form: 21.5

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

4
4

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

2
Charleroi
Cremonese
Charleroi

Power Rating Breakdown

42.5

Overall

Attack 33.8
Defense 58.4
Form 36.9
Consistency 44.8
Cremonese

Power Rating Breakdown

36.5

Overall

Attack 32.3
Defense 46.7
Form 21.5
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.5 vs 90.0

Opponent Quality

52.5 vs 62.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Charleroi logo Charleroi
W
Antwerp (45%)
W
Genk (49%)
W
OHL (40%)
D
Genk (54%)
L
Standard (55%)
W
Antwerp (52%)
L
Westerlo (62%)
L
ZW (70%)
Cremonese logo Cremonese
W
Pisa (40%)
L
Lazio (70%)
L
Napoli (79%)
D
Torino (69%)
L
Cagliari (58%)
L
Bologna (58%)
W
Parma (62%)
L
Fiorentina (66%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Antwerp A
1 - 0 W
45%
Genk H
2 - 0 W
49%
OHL A
2 - 0 W
40%
Genk A
1 - 1 D
54%
Standard H
1 - 2 L
55%
Antwerp H
2 - 1 W
52%
Westerlo A
0 - 2 L
62%
ZW A
0 - 1 L
70%
OHL H
0 - 2 L
47%
Dender A
2 - 2 D
51%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pisa H
3 - 0 W
40%
Lazio H
1 - 2 L
70%
Napoli A
0 - 4 L
79%
Torino H
0 - 0 D
69%
Cagliari A
0 - 1 L
58%
Bologna H
1 - 2 L
58%
Parma A
2 - 0 W
62%
Fiorentina H
1 - 4 L
66%
Lecce A
1 - 2 L
58%
AC Milan H
0 - 2 L
60%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Cremonese has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 57.7) compared to Charleroi (SoS: 42.2). This means Cremonese's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Charleroi averaging 1.1 and Cremonese averaging 0.9 goals per match.

Charleroi has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Cremonese's 1.7.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.4 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Charleroi has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Charleroi

Charleroi

VS
Cremonese

Cremonese

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more