Compare Charleroi vs Go Ahead

Charleroi vs Go Ahead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Charleroi vs Go Ahead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Charleroi Home Team

Go Ahead Away Team

Charleroi

42.5

W W W D L W L L L D

Last 10 Matches

Go Ahead

56.1

L D D D W L W L W W

Categories Won

Charleroi

Draw

Go Ahead

Performance Radar

Charleroi

Go Ahead

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

A. Bernier (3 goals)

J. Breum (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 12

Home Win Rate

50%

2W / 4 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate

33%

2W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

42.2

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 52.5

53.2

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 60.7

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.03

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.07

2.0

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating

42.5

Attack: 33.8, Defense: 58.4, Form: 36.9

56.1

Attack: 68.8, Defense: 61.9, Form: 41.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Charleroi

Go Ahead

Power Rating Breakdown

42.5

Overall

Attack 33.8

Defense 58.4

Form 36.9

Consistency 44.8

Power Rating Breakdown

56.1

Overall

Attack 68.8

Defense 61.9

Form 41.3

Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.5 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

52.5 vs 60.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Charleroi

Go Ahead

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Antwerp A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 0 W

45%

Genk H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

49%

OHL A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

40%

Genk A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

54%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

55%

Antwerp H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

52%

Westerlo A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

62%

ZW A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 1 L

70%

OHL H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

47%

Dender A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

51%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

PSV H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 4 L

75%

Sparta A

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 2 D

49%

AZ H

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 0 D

67%

Groningen A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 0 D

66%

Zwolle H

Dutch Eredivisie

5 - 0 W

54%

Utrecht A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

75%

NAC H

Dutch Eredivisie

6 - 0 W

49%

Twente H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 4 L

76%

Excelsior A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 0 W

60%

Heracles H

Dutch Eredivisie

4 - 0 W

36%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Go Ahead has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.2) compared to Charleroi (SoS: 42.2). This means Go Ahead's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Go Ahead holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus Charleroi's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Charleroi conceding 1.1 and Go Ahead conceding 1.2 per match.

Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being unlikely.

Go Ahead has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Charleroi

Go Ahead

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair