Compare Standard vs Malmö

Standard vs Malmö Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Standard vs Malmö: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Standard Home Team

Malmö Away Team

Standard

65.8

W W D L W L W D D W

Last 10 Matches

Malmö

39.9

L L W L W W D L L L

Categories Won

Standard

Draw

Malmö

Performance Radar

Standard

Malmö

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-2

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

C. Nielsen (3 goals)

S. Hakšabanović (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 14

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7

Home Win Rate

25%

1W / 4 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

67%

4W / 6 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

66.9

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 51.8

45.2

League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1

Elite Opponent Record

100%

1W / 1 matches

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.77

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.07

1.44

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04

Adjusted Power Rating

65.8

Attack: 66.2, Defense: 81.8, Form: 58.5

39.9

Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Standard

Malmö

Power Rating Breakdown

65.8

Overall

Attack 66.2

Defense 81.8

Form 58.5

Consistency 53.2

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 44.4

Defense 44.4

Form 28.6

Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.5 vs 60.5

Opponent Quality

51.8 vs 60.1

Elite Opponent Record

100% vs 0%

Standard

Malmö

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

OHL H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

35%

Antwerp A

Belgian First Division A

5 - 0 W

45%

Genk A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

54%

Antwerp H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

40%

Charleroi A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

51%

Westerlo H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

57%

OHL A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

3 - 1 W

52%

Westerlo H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

57%

Antwerp A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 1 D

57%

ZW A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

70%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Häcken A

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

58%

Mjällby H

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

54%

AIK A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 0 W

49%

Sirius H

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

65%

Djurgården A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 0 W

59%

GAIS H

Swedish Allsvenskan

3 - 1 W

47%

Örgryte A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 1 D

41%

Genk A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 2 L

70%

Red Star H

UEFA Europa League

0 - 1 L

81%

Porto A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 2 L

77%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Standard has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 66.9) compared to Malmö (SoS: 45.2). This means Standard's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Standard holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Malmö's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Standard has the defensive edge, conceding 0.9 per match compared to Malmö's 1.6.

Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Standard is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Standard emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (65.8 vs 39.9) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Standard

Malmö

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair