Skip to content
Compare Standard vs Napredak

Standard vs Napredak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Standard vs Napredak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Standard Standard Home Team
Napredak Napredak Away Team
Standard
65.8
W W D L W L W D D W

Last 10 Matches

Napredak
25.8
W L L L L L L L D L

Categories Won

13

Standard

1

Draw

1

Napredak

Performance Radar

Standard
Napredak

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 3D, 2L

10%

1W, 1D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
C. Nielsen (3 goals)
N. Bogdanovski (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
66.9

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 51.8

41.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

Elite Opponent Record
100%

1W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.77

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.07

0.82

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
65.8

Attack: 66.2, Defense: 81.8, Form: 58.5

25.8

Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1

16-30'

3

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

2
4

61-75'

1
8

76-90+'

3
Standard
Napredak
Standard

Power Rating Breakdown

65.8

Overall

Attack 66.2
Defense 81.8
Form 58.5
Consistency 53.2
Napredak

Power Rating Breakdown

25.8

Overall

Attack 24.4
Defense 18.3
Form 9.1
Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.5 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

51.8 vs 55.5

Elite Opponent Record

100% vs 0%
Standard logo Standard
W
OHL (35%)
W
Antwerp (45%)
D
Genk (54%)
L
Antwerp (40%)
W
Charleroi (51%)
L
Westerlo (57%)
W
OHL (52%)
D
Westerlo (57%)
Napredak logo Napredak
W
Spartak (33%)
L
Radnički Niš (44%)
L
Javor (56%)
L
FK IMT (58%)
L
TSC (60%)
L
Mladost Lučani (53%)
L
TSC (56%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
OHL H
2 - 1 W
35%
Antwerp A
5 - 0 W
45%
Genk A
1 - 1 D
54%
Antwerp H
1 - 2 L
40%
Charleroi A
2 - 1 W
51%
Westerlo H
1 - 2 L
57%
OHL A
3 - 1 W
52%
Westerlo H
0 - 0 D
57%
Antwerp A
1 - 1 D
57%
ZW A
1 - 0 W
70%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Spartak A
3 - 0 W
33%
Radnički Niš H
0 - 1 L
44%
Javor A
0 - 4 L
56%
FK IMT H
0 - 1 L
58%
TSC A
1 - 4 L
60%
Mladost Lučani A
0 - 2 L
53%
TSC H
1 - 2 L
56%
Vojvodina A
1 - 4 L
68%
OFK H
2 - 2 D
53%
Red Star A
0 - 4 L
74%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Standard has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 66.9) compared to Napredak (SoS: 41.4). This means Standard's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Standard holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Napredak's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Standard is far superior, conceding just 0.9 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Napredak leaks 2.4 per match.

Standard is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, Standard is the clear and decisive favorite. Their superiority across attack (66.2), defense (81.8), and form (58.5) leaves little room for doubt. Napredak will need an exceptional performance to compete.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Standard

Standard

VS
Napredak

Napredak

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more