Skip to content
Compare Standard vs Winterthur

Standard vs Winterthur Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Standard vs Winterthur: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Standard Standard Home Team
Winterthur Winterthur Away Team
Standard
65.8
W W D L W L W D D W

Last 10 Matches

Winterthur
33.7
L W D L L L L W D D

Categories Won

11

Standard

2

Draw

2

Winterthur

Performance Radar

Standard
Winterthur

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 3D, 2L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
C. Nielsen (3 goals)
N. Burkart (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
66.9

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 51.8

36.6

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 48.5

Elite Opponent Record
100%

1W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.77

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.07

1.46

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
65.8

Attack: 66.2, Defense: 81.8, Form: 58.5

33.7

Attack: 40.4, Defense: 28.9, Form: 17.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

3
4

61-75'

1
8

76-90+'

1
Standard
Winterthur
Standard

Power Rating Breakdown

65.8

Overall

Attack 66.2
Defense 81.8
Form 58.5
Consistency 53.2
Winterthur

Power Rating Breakdown

33.7

Overall

Attack 40.4
Defense 28.9
Form 17.3
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.5 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

51.8 vs 48.5

Elite Opponent Record

100% vs 0%
Standard logo Standard
W
OHL (35%)
W
Antwerp (45%)
D
Genk (54%)
L
Antwerp (40%)
W
Charleroi (51%)
L
Westerlo (57%)
W
OHL (52%)
D
Westerlo (57%)
Winterthur logo Winterthur
L
GC Zürich (36%)
W
Lausanne (42%)
D
Zürich (37%)
L
Servette (70%)
L
GC Zürich (27%)
L
Lausanne (43%)
L
Basel (46%)
W
Luzern (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
OHL H
2 - 1 W
35%
Antwerp A
5 - 0 W
45%
Genk A
1 - 1 D
54%
Antwerp H
1 - 2 L
40%
Charleroi A
2 - 1 W
51%
Westerlo H
1 - 2 L
57%
OHL A
3 - 1 W
52%
Westerlo H
0 - 0 D
57%
Antwerp A
1 - 1 D
57%
ZW A
1 - 0 W
70%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
GC Zürich A
2 - 3 L
36%
Lausanne H
2 - 1 W
42%
Zürich H
2 - 2 D
37%
Servette A
3 - 5 L
70%
GC Zürich H
0 - 2 L
27%
Lausanne A
1 - 2 L
43%
Basel H
0 - 2 L
46%
Luzern A
2 - 1 W
57%
Sion A
1 - 1 D
66%
Servette H
1 - 1 D
61%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Standard has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 66.9) compared to Winterthur (SoS: 36.6). This means Standard's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Standard holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Winterthur's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Standard is far superior, conceding just 0.9 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Winterthur leaks 2.0 per match.

Standard is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, Standard is the clear and decisive favorite. Their superiority across attack (66.2), defense (81.8), and form (58.5) leaves little room for doubt. Winterthur will need an exceptional performance to compete.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Standard

Standard

VS
Winterthur

Winterthur

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more