Skip to content
Compare Strasbourg vs Go Ahead

Strasbourg vs Go Ahead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Strasbourg vs Go Ahead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Strasbourg Strasbourg Home Team
Go Ahead Go Ahead Away Team
Strasbourg
41.4
D L L L W L L W L W

Last 10 Matches

Go Ahead
56.1
L D D D W L W L W W

Categories Won

1

Strasbourg

3

Draw

11

Go Ahead

Performance Radar

Strasbourg
Go Ahead

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Enciso (3 goals)
J. Breum (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.9

League Difficulty: 78.7, Opponent Quality: 61.3

53.2

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 60.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.31

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.11

2.0

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
41.4

Attack: 41.2, Defense: 51.4, Form: 30.9

56.1

Attack: 68.8, Defense: 61.9, Form: 41.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4
3

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

5
3

61-75'

4
2

76-90+'

3
Strasbourg
Go Ahead
Strasbourg

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 41.2
Defense 51.4
Form 30.9
Consistency 46.0
Go Ahead

Power Rating Breakdown

56.1

Overall

Attack 68.8
Defense 61.9
Form 41.3
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

78.7 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

61.3 vs 60.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Strasbourg logo Strasbourg
D
Angers (52%)
L
Rayo (68%)
L
Toulouse (57%)
L
Rayo (73%)
W
Lorient (69%)
L
Nice (39%)
L
Rennes (75%)
W
Mainz 05 (60%)
Go Ahead logo Go Ahead
L
PSV (75%)
D
Sparta (49%)
D
AZ (67%)
D
Groningen (66%)
W
Zwolle (54%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
W
NAC (49%)
L
Twente (76%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Angers A
1 - 1 D
52%
Rayo H
0 - 1 L
68%
Toulouse H
1 - 2 L
57%
Rayo A
0 - 1 L
73%
Lorient A
3 - 2 W
69%
Nice H
0 - 2 L
39%
Rennes H
0 - 3 L
75%
Mainz 05 H
4 - 0 W
60%
Mainz 05 A
0 - 2 L
65%
Nice H
3 - 1 W
55%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PSV H
1 - 4 L
75%
Sparta A
2 - 2 D
49%
AZ H
0 - 0 D
67%
Groningen A
0 - 0 D
66%
Zwolle H
5 - 0 W
54%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
NAC H
6 - 0 W
49%
Twente H
1 - 4 L
76%
Excelsior A
1 - 0 W
60%
Heracles H
4 - 0 W
36%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 52.9 vs 53.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Go Ahead holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus Strasbourg's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Go Ahead has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Strasbourg's 1.5.

Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being unlikely.

Go Ahead has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.7 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Strasbourg

Strasbourg

VS
Go Ahead

Go Ahead

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more