Skip to content
Compare Sturm vs Go Ahead

Sturm vs Go Ahead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Sturm vs Go Ahead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Sturm Sturm Home Team
Go Ahead Go Ahead Away Team
Sturm
59.4
W D D D D D W D W W

Last 10 Matches

Go Ahead
56.1
L D D D W L W L W W

Categories Won

5

Sturm

4

Draw

6

Go Ahead

Performance Radar

Sturm
Go Ahead

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 6D, 0L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+9

+9

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
O. Kiteishvili (5 goals)
J. Breum (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.6

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.0

53.2

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 60.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.71

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.09

2.0

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
59.4

Attack: 61.6, Defense: 71.8, Form: 41.0

56.1

Attack: 68.8, Defense: 61.9, Form: 41.3

Goal Timing Analysis

5

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

2

31-45'

2
6

46-60'

5
1

61-75'

4
5

76-90+'

3
Sturm
Go Ahead
Sturm

Power Rating Breakdown

59.4

Overall

Attack 61.6
Defense 71.8
Form 41.0
Consistency 71.2
Go Ahead

Power Rating Breakdown

56.1

Overall

Attack 68.8
Defense 61.9
Form 41.3
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

51.0 vs 60.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Sturm logo Sturm
W
Hartberg (44%)
D
RB Salzburg (51%)
D
Austria (48%)
D
LASK (64%)
D
LASK (69%)
D
Hartberg (39%)
W
Rapid Vienna (53%)
D
RB Salzburg (46%)
Go Ahead logo Go Ahead
L
PSV (75%)
D
Sparta (49%)
D
AZ (67%)
D
Groningen (66%)
W
Zwolle (54%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
W
NAC (49%)
L
Twente (76%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hartberg A
4 - 2 W
44%
RB Salzburg A
1 - 1 D
51%
Austria H
1 - 1 D
48%
LASK H
1 - 1 D
64%
LASK A
1 - 1 D
69%
Hartberg H
0 - 0 D
39%
Rapid Vienna A
2 - 0 W
53%
RB Salzburg H
1 - 1 D
46%
Austria A
5 - 2 W
53%
Altach H
2 - 0 W
43%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PSV H
1 - 4 L
75%
Sparta A
2 - 2 D
49%
AZ H
0 - 0 D
67%
Groningen A
0 - 0 D
66%
Zwolle H
5 - 0 W
54%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
NAC H
6 - 0 W
49%
Twente H
1 - 4 L
76%
Excelsior A
1 - 0 W
60%
Heracles H
4 - 0 W
36%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 52.6 vs 53.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Sturm averaging 1.8 and Go Ahead averaging 2.0 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Sturm conceding 0.9 and Go Ahead conceding 1.2 per match.

Sturm has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Sturm is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Sturm

Sturm

VS
Go Ahead

Go Ahead

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more