Skip to content
Compare Teplice vs NEC

Teplice vs NEC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Teplice vs NEC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Teplice Teplice Home Team
NEC NEC Away Team
Teplice
44.4
W W D L L L D D D D

Last 10 Matches

NEC
56.6
L D D D W D W W L D

Categories Won

0

Teplice

3

Draw

12

NEC

Performance Radar

Teplice
NEC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 5D, 3L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
D. Mareček (3 goals)
B. Linssen (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.3

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 50.1

67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.4

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.1

2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

Adjusted Power Rating
44.4

Attack: 44.8, Defense: 58.5, Form: 20.7

56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1

16-30'

4
2

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

4
Teplice
NEC
Teplice

Power Rating Breakdown

44.4

Overall

Attack 44.8
Defense 58.5
Form 20.7
Consistency 67.3
NEC

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6
Defense 66.6
Form 35.2
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

50.1 vs 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%
Teplice logo Teplice
W
Zlín (46%)
W
Ostrava (34%)
D
Slovácko (45%)
L
Hradec Kr. (59%)
L
Zlín (46%)
L
Sparta Prague (51%)
D
Plzeň (64%)
D
Liberec (48%)
NEC logo NEC
L
Groningen (66%)
D
Telstar (64%)
D
Twente (81%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
W
Excelsior (60%)
D
Heerenveen (67%)
W
PSV (80%)
W
Volendam (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Zlín A
4 - 2 W
46%
Ostrava H
2 - 1 W
34%
Slovácko H
1 - 1 D
45%
Hradec Kr. H
0 - 1 L
59%
Zlín A
2 - 3 L
46%
Sparta Prague H
0 - 1 L
51%
Plzeň A
2 - 2 D
64%
Liberec A
1 - 1 D
48%
Dukla H
0 - 0 D
46%
Pardubice A
1 - 1 D
62%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Groningen A
1 - 2 L
66%
Telstar H
1 - 1 D
64%
Twente A
1 - 1 D
81%
Feyenoord H
1 - 1 D
67%
Excelsior A
2 - 0 W
60%
Heerenveen H
2 - 2 D
67%
PSV A
3 - 2 W
80%
Volendam H
3 - 0 W
49%
Fortuna H
2 - 3 L
56%
Ajax A
1 - 1 D
67%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

NEC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.5) compared to Teplice (SoS: 53.3). This means NEC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

NEC holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Teplice's 1.3, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Teplice conceding 1.3 and NEC conceding 1.3 per match.

Teplice has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

NEC has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Teplice

Teplice

VS
NEC

NEC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more