Compare Thun vs Anderlecht

Thun vs Anderlecht Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Thun vs Anderlecht: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Thun Home Team

Anderlecht Away Team

Thun

41.3

L L L W L L W W D W

Last 10 Matches

Anderlecht

34.9

D L L L W W L L L D

Categories Won

Thun

Draw

Anderlecht

Performance Radar

Thun

Anderlecht

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-7

Clean Sheet

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

E. Rastoder (3 goals)

M. Cvetković (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 10

Home Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

37.3

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 50.6

44.5

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 59.1

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.36

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.24

1.41

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.01

Adjusted Power Rating

41.3

Attack: 46.6, Defense: 43.6, Form: 34.9

34.9

Attack: 44.1, Defense: 28.4, Form: 18.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Thun

Anderlecht

Power Rating Breakdown

41.3

Overall

Attack 46.6

Defense 43.6

Form 34.9

Consistency 39.7

Power Rating Breakdown

34.9

Overall

Attack 44.1

Defense 28.4

Form 18.9

Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

50.6 vs 59.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Thun

Anderlecht

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Sion A

Swiss Super League

0 - 2 L

70%

Basel A

Swiss Super League

1 - 3 L

55%

Lugano H

Swiss Super League

0 - 1 L

54%

Basel H

Swiss Super League

3 - 1 W

50%

Lugano A

Brack Super League

0 - 1 L

55%

Zürich A

Brack Super League

1 - 2 L

37%

GC Zürich H

Brack Super League

5 - 1 W

27%

Young Boys A

Brack Super League

2 - 1 W

56%

St.Gallen H

Brack Super League

2 - 2 D

55%

Luzern H

Brack Super League

2 - 1 W

47%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Gent A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

51%

Club Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 3 L

66%

R. Union SG H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 3 L

64%

Sint-Truiden A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 2 L

49%

Mechelen A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

34%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

3 - 1 W

58%

Club Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 4 L

83%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 3 L

58%

Mechelen A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 1 L

45%

Club Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

83%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 37.3 vs 44.5), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Thun averaging 1.6 and Anderlecht averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Thun has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Anderlecht's 2.1.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Thun has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Thun

Anderlecht

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair