Skip to content
Compare Thun vs Hamburg

Thun vs Hamburg Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Thun vs Hamburg: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Thun Thun Home Team
Hamburg Hamburg Away Team
Thun
41.4
L L L W L L W W D W

Last 10 Matches

Hamburg
41.5
W W L L L D L D W L

Categories Won

6

Thun

4

Draw

5

Hamburg

Performance Radar

Thun
Hamburg

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
R. Glatzel (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.5

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

59.5

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 66.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

1.67

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.37

Adjusted Power Rating
41.4

Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0

41.5

Attack: 47.5, Defense: 40.2, Form: 32.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

5
4

46-60'

4
3

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

Thun
Hamburg
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 46.7
Defense 43.8
Form 35.0
Consistency 39.7
Hamburg

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 47.5
Defense 40.2
Form 32.9
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.0 vs 91.0

Opponent Quality

51.2 vs 66.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (38%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)
Hamburg logo Hamburg
W
Freiburg (67%)
W
Frankfurt (67%)
L
Hoffenheim (65%)
L
Bremen (67%)
L
Stuttgart (75%)
D
Augsburg (66%)
L
Dortmund (76%)
D
Köln (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Freiburg H
3 - 2 W
67%
Frankfurt A
2 - 1 W
67%
Hoffenheim H
1 - 2 L
65%
Bremen A
1 - 3 L
67%
Stuttgart A
0 - 4 L
75%
Augsburg H
1 - 1 D
66%
Dortmund A
2 - 3 L
76%
Köln H
1 - 1 D
57%
Wolfsburg A
2 - 1 W
55%
Leverkusen H
0 - 1 L
65%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Hamburg has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 59.5) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.5). This means Hamburg's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Thun holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Hamburg's 1.3, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Thun has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Hamburg's 1.9.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Thun

Thun

VS
Hamburg

Hamburg

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more