Skip to content
Compare Thun vs Kocaelispor

Thun vs Kocaelispor Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Thun vs Kocaelispor: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Thun Thun Home Team
Kocaelispor Kocaelispor Away Team
Thun
41.4
L L L W L L W W D W

Last 10 Matches

Kocaelispor
36.8
L D L D D D L L W L

Categories Won

8

Thun

4

Draw

3

Kocaelispor

Performance Radar

Thun
Kocaelispor

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

0.5

5 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
S. Dursun (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.5

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

64.6

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 59.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

0.51

Actual: 0.5 | Diff: -0.01

Adjusted Power Rating
41.4

Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0

36.8

Attack: 19.1, Defense: 64.9, Form: 11.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

4

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

1
Thun
Kocaelispor
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 46.7
Defense 43.8
Form 35.0
Consistency 39.7
Kocaelispor

Power Rating Breakdown

36.8

Overall

Attack 19.1
Defense 64.9
Form 11.5
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.0 vs 72.0

Opponent Quality

51.2 vs 59.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (38%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)
Kocaelispor logo Kocaelispor
L
Fatih (55%)
D
Kasımpaşa (57%)
L
Gençlerbirliği (50%)
D
Göztepe (59%)
D
Galatasaray (69%)
D
Başakşehir (66%)
L
Alanyaspor (61%)
L
Konyaspor (61%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fatih H
0 - 1 L
55%
Kasımpaşa A
1 - 1 D
57%
Gençlerbirliği A
0 - 1 L
50%
Göztepe H
1 - 1 D
59%
Galatasaray A
1 - 1 D
69%
Başakşehir H
0 - 0 D
66%
Alanyaspor A
0 - 5 L
61%
Konyaspor H
1 - 2 L
61%
Eyüp A
1 - 0 W
58%
Beşiktaş H
0 - 1 L
60%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Kocaelispor has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 64.6) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.5). This means Kocaelispor's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Thun's attack is on another level, averaging 1.6 goals per match with E. Rastoder leading the charge with 3 goals. Kocaelispor manages just 0.5 per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Thun conceding 1.5 and Kocaelispor conceding 1.3 per match.

Kocaelispor has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Thun

Thun

VS
Kocaelispor

Kocaelispor

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more