Skip to content
Compare Thun vs LNZ Cherkasy

Thun vs LNZ Cherkasy Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Thun vs LNZ Cherkasy: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Thun Thun Home Team
LNZ Cherkasy LNZ Cherkasy Away Team
Thun
41.4
L L L W L L W W D W

Last 10 Matches

LNZ Cherkasy
60.7
D D D L D W W W W L

Categories Won

4

Thun

3

Draw

8

LNZ Cherkasy

Performance Radar

Thun
LNZ Cherkasy

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
M. Assinor (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.5

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

67.6

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 71.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

14%

1W / 7 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

1.53

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.13

Adjusted Power Rating
41.4

Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0

60.7

Attack: 54.9, Defense: 86.2, Form: 47.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

3
3

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

5
Thun
LNZ Cherkasy
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 46.7
Defense 43.8
Form 35.0
Consistency 39.7
LNZ Cherkasy

Power Rating Breakdown

60.7

Overall

Attack 54.9
Defense 86.2
Form 47.0
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.0 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

51.2 vs 71.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 14%
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (38%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)
LNZ Cherkasy logo LNZ Cherkasy
D
Dynamo Kyiv (78%)
D
Karpaty Lviv (86%)
D
Metalist 1925 (74%)
L
Kolos (83%)
D
Shakhtar D (78%)
W
Kryvbas KR (76%)
W
Rukh Vynnyky (49%)
W
Oleksandria (44%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dynamo Kyiv H
0 - 0 D
78%
Karpaty Lviv A
0 - 0 D
86%
Metalist 1925 H
1 - 1 D
74%
Kolos A
0 - 1 L
83%
Shakhtar D H
2 - 2 D
78%
Kryvbas KR A
3 - 0 W
76%
Rukh Vynnyky A
2 - 1 W
49%
Oleksandria H
2 - 0 W
44%
Veres Rivne A
3 - 0 W
67%
Polissya H
1 - 3 L
77%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

LNZ Cherkasy has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.6) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.5). This means LNZ Cherkasy's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Thun averaging 1.6 and LNZ Cherkasy averaging 1.4 goals per match.

LNZ Cherkasy has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Thun's 1.5.

LNZ Cherkasy has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

LNZ Cherkasy is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

LNZ Cherkasy emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (60.7 vs 41.4) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Thun

Thun

VS
LNZ Cherkasy

LNZ Cherkasy

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more