Skip to content
Compare Thun vs Lorient

Thun vs Lorient Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Thun vs Lorient: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Thun Thun Home Team
Lorient Lorient Away Team
Thun
41.3
L L L W L L W W D W

Last 10 Matches

Lorient
51.4
W D L W L D L W D D

Categories Won

5

Thun

2

Draw

8

Lorient

Performance Radar

Thun
Lorient

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

+3

+3

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
B. Dieng (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.3

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 50.6

60.2

League Difficulty: 81.9, Opponent Quality: 64.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.36

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.24

1.78

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.38

Adjusted Power Rating
41.3

Attack: 46.6, Defense: 43.6, Form: 34.9

51.4

Attack: 51.4, Defense: 69.8, Form: 33.1

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

4
4

31-45'

4

46-60'

3
3

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

5
Thun
Lorient
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.3

Overall

Attack 46.6
Defense 43.6
Form 34.9
Consistency 39.7
Lorient

Power Rating Breakdown

51.4

Overall

Attack 51.4
Defense 69.8
Form 33.1
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.0 vs 81.9

Opponent Quality

50.6 vs 64.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 20%
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (37%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)
Lorient logo Lorient
W
Metz (48%)
D
Paris SG (84%)
L
Strasbourg (55%)
W
Marseille (61%)
L
Lyon (70%)
D
Paris FC (72%)
L
Toulouse (62%)
W
Lens (71%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
37%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
47%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Metz A
4 - 0 W
48%
Paris SG A
2 - 2 D
84%
Strasbourg H
2 - 3 L
55%
Marseille H
2 - 0 W
61%
Lyon A
0 - 2 L
70%
Paris FC H
1 - 1 D
72%
Toulouse A
0 - 1 L
62%
Lens H
2 - 1 W
71%
Lille A
1 - 1 D
78%
Nice H
0 - 0 D
39%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Lorient has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 60.2) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.3). This means Lorient's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Thun averaging 1.6 and Lorient averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Lorient has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Thun's 1.5.

Lorient has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Lorient has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.1 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Thun

Thun

VS
Lorient

Lorient

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more