Skip to content
Compare Thun vs Tondela

Thun vs Tondela Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Thun vs Tondela: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Thun Thun Home Team
Tondela Tondela Away Team
Thun
41.4
L L L W L L W W D W

Last 10 Matches

Tondela
37.0
W W D L L D L D L D

Categories Won

10

Thun

2

Draw

3

Tondela

Performance Radar

Thun
Tondela

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

20%

2W, 4D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
Rony Lopes (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.5

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

52.7

League Difficulty: 79.0, Opponent Quality: 60.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

0.92

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
41.4

Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0

37.0

Attack: 30.8, Defense: 47.9, Form: 20.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

4

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

3
Thun
Tondela
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 46.7
Defense 43.8
Form 35.0
Consistency 39.7
Tondela

Power Rating Breakdown

37.0

Overall

Attack 30.8
Defense 47.9
Form 20.5
Consistency 64.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.0 vs 79.0

Opponent Quality

51.2 vs 60.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (38%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)
Tondela logo Tondela
W
Moreirense (50%)
W
Casa Pia (53%)
D
Sporting (75%)
L
Nacional (52%)
L
Porto (74%)
D
Gil Vicente (55%)
L
Vitória SC (59%)
D
AVS (59%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Moreirense H
2 - 0 W
50%
Casa Pia A
1 - 0 W
53%
Sporting A
2 - 2 D
75%
Nacional H
0 - 2 L
52%
Porto A
0 - 2 L
74%
Gil Vicente H
2 - 2 D
55%
Vitória SC A
0 - 5 L
59%
AVS H
0 - 0 D
59%
Rio Ave H
0 - 1 L
61%
Santa Clara H
2 - 2 D
66%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Tondela has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 52.7) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.5). This means Tondela's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Thun holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Tondela's 0.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Thun conceding 1.5 and Tondela conceding 1.6 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Thun

Thun

VS
Tondela

Tondela

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more