Skip to content
Compare Thun vs Volos

Thun vs Volos Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Thun vs Volos: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Thun Thun Home Team
Volos Volos Away Team
Thun
41.4
L L L W L L W W D W

Last 10 Matches

Volos
34.6
L L L D W L D D L D

Categories Won

10

Thun

3

Draw

2

Volos

Performance Radar

Thun
Volos

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-9

-9

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
J. Hurtado (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.5

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

53.4

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 51.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

1.2

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
41.4

Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0

34.6

Attack: 41.4, Defense: 31.0, Form: 10.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

4
Thun
Volos
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 46.7
Defense 43.8
Form 35.0
Consistency 39.7
Volos

Power Rating Breakdown

34.6

Overall

Attack 41.4
Defense 31.0
Form 10.3
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.0 vs 56.0

Opponent Quality

51.2 vs 51.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (38%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)
Volos logo Volos
L
Levadiakos (44%)
L
Levadiakos (49%)
L
Aris (58%)
D
OFI (44%)
W
PAOK (54%)
L
Kifisia (54%)
D
OFI (44%)
D
AEK Athens (62%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Levadiakos H
0 - 3 L
44%
Levadiakos A
2 - 5 L
49%
Aris A
2 - 3 L
58%
OFI H
1 - 1 D
44%
PAOK H
2 - 1 W
54%
Kifisia A
0 - 2 L
54%
OFI H
1 - 1 D
44%
AEK Athens H
2 - 2 D
62%
Panserraikos A
1 - 2 L
54%
Aris H
1 - 1 D
53%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Volos has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.4) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.5). This means Volos's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Thun holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Volos's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Thun has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Volos's 2.1.

Volos has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Thun has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Thun

Thun

VS
Volos

Volos

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more