Compare Tromsø vs Paris FC

Tromsø vs Paris FC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Tromsø vs Paris FC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Tromsø Home Team

Paris FC Away Team

Tromsø

64.8

W D L W W D W W W W

Last 10 Matches

Paris FC

65.0

L W L W W D W D D W

Categories Won

Tromsø

Draw

Paris FC

Performance Radar

Tromsø

Paris FC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

70%

7W, 2D, 1L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

0.8

8 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

J. Hjertø-Dahl (5 goals)

M. Munetsi (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11

1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 9

Home Win Rate

71%

5W / 7 matches

80%

4W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

67%

2W / 3 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

48.0

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 46.7

62.9

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 63.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.56

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.14

2.35

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.55

Adjusted Power Rating

64.8

Attack: 55.5, Defense: 71.9, Form: 68.6

65.0

Attack: 67.7, Defense: 79.0, Form: 56.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Tromsø

Paris FC

Power Rating Breakdown

64.8

Overall

Attack 55.5

Defense 71.9

Form 68.6

Consistency 63.7

Power Rating Breakdown

65.0

Overall

Attack 67.7

Defense 79.0

Form 56.5

Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 86.0

Opponent Quality

46.7 vs 63.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 25%

Tromsø

Paris FC

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Molde H

Norwegian Eliteserien

2 - 0 W

52%

Start A

Norwegian Eliteserien

1 - 1 D

40%

Brann H

Norwegian Eliteserien

0 - 5 L

45%

Sandefjord H

Norwegian Eliteserien

3 - 1 W

50%

Sarpsborg A

Norwegian Eliteserien

1 - 0 W

47%

Lillestrøm H

Norwegian Eliteserien

0 - 0 D

57%

Kristiansund H

Norwegian Eliteserien

2 - 0 W

45%

Rosenborg H

Norwegian Eliteserien

2 - 0 W

42%

Brann A

Norwegian Eliteserien

2 - 1 W

50%

Fredrikstad H

Norwegian Eliteserien

4 - 0 W

39%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Rennes A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

80%

Brest H

French Ligue 1

4 - 0 W

56%

Lille H

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

73%

Metz A

French Ligue 1

3 - 1 W

48%

Monaco H

French Ligue 1

4 - 1 W

72%

Lorient A

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

69%

Le Havre H

French Ligue 1

3 - 2 W

53%

Strasbourg A

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

60%

Lyon A

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

70%

Nice H

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

55%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Paris FC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 62.9) compared to Tromsø (SoS: 48.0). This means Paris FC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Tromsø averaging 1.7 and Paris FC averaging 1.8 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Tromsø conceding 0.8 and Paris FC conceding 0.9 per match.

Tromsø has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Paris FC has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

The home advantage factor favors Paris FC, who boasts a 80% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Tromsø is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Tromsø

Paris FC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair