Skip to content
Compare Vojvodina vs Como

Vojvodina vs Como Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Vojvodina vs Como: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Vojvodina Vojvodina Home Team
Como Como Away Team
Vojvodina
57.5
W W D D L W D W W W

Last 10 Matches

Como
62.2
W D W L L L D W W W

Categories Won

5

Vojvodina

2

Draw

8

Como

Performance Radar

Vojvodina
Como

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 3D, 1L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+9

+9

+7

+7

Clean Sheet
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Veličković (3 goals)
T. Douvikas (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.5

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 52.9

63.4

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 65.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.62

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.08

2.05

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25

Adjusted Power Rating
57.5

Attack: 51.3, Defense: 66.4, Form: 54.3

62.2

Attack: 68.0, Defense: 71.8, Form: 56.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
4

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

4
5

61-75'

3
5

76-90+'

4
Vojvodina
Como
Vojvodina

Power Rating Breakdown

57.5

Overall

Attack 51.3
Defense 66.4
Form 54.3
Consistency 61.3
Como

Power Rating Breakdown

62.2

Overall

Attack 68.0
Defense 71.8
Form 56.7
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 85.5

Opponent Quality

52.9 vs 65.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 25%
Vojvodina logo Vojvodina
W
Čukarički (46%)
W
Radnik (55%)
D
Železničar P (57%)
D
Partizan (52%)
L
Red Star (74%)
W
Radnički Niš (44%)
D
FK IMT (63%)
W
Napredak (29%)
Como logo Como
W
Verona (55%)
D
Napoli (74%)
W
Genoa (67%)
L
Inter Milan (66%)
L
Sassuolo (69%)
L
Inter Milan (78%)
D
Udinese (79%)
W
Pisa (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Čukarički H
1 - 0 W
46%
Radnik A
4 - 1 W
55%
Železničar P H
0 - 0 D
57%
Partizan H
0 - 0 D
52%
Red Star A
1 - 4 L
74%
Radnički Niš H
3 - 2 W
44%
FK IMT A
0 - 0 D
63%
Napredak H
4 - 1 W
29%
Radnički Krag A
1 - 0 W
57%
Partizan H
3 - 0 W
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Verona A
1 - 0 W
55%
Napoli H
0 - 0 D
74%
Genoa A
2 - 0 W
67%
Inter Milan A
2 - 3 L
66%
Sassuolo A
1 - 2 L
69%
Inter Milan H
3 - 4 L
78%
Udinese A
0 - 0 D
79%
Pisa H
5 - 0 W
40%
Roma H
2 - 1 W
70%
Cagliari A
2 - 1 W
58%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Como has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 63.4) compared to Vojvodina (SoS: 40.5). This means Como's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Vojvodina averaging 1.7 and Como averaging 1.8 goals per match.

Vojvodina has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Como's 1.1.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Vojvodina

Vojvodina

VS
Como

Como

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more