Skip to content
Compare Volendam vs Cremonese

Volendam vs Cremonese Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Volendam vs Cremonese: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Volendam Volendam Home Team
Cremonese Cremonese Away Team
Volendam
36.2
D L W L D L L L W L

Last 10 Matches

Cremonese
36.5
W L L D L L W L L L

Categories Won

3

Volendam

4

Draw

8

Cremonese

Performance Radar

Volendam
Cremonese

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 2D, 6L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Mühren (3 goals)
F. Bonazzoli (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.2

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 60.5

57.7

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 62.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.77

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.03

1.12

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.22

Adjusted Power Rating
36.2

Attack: 27.5, Defense: 51.6, Form: 20.6

36.5

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 46.7, Form: 21.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

16-30'

1

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

2
Volendam
Cremonese
Volendam

Power Rating Breakdown

36.2

Overall

Attack 27.5
Defense 51.6
Form 20.6
Consistency 59.2
Cremonese

Power Rating Breakdown

36.5

Overall

Attack 32.3
Defense 46.7
Form 21.5
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 90.0

Opponent Quality

60.5 vs 62.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Volendam logo Volendam
D
Excelsior (60%)
L
Heerenveen (67%)
W
Heracles (41%)
L
Twente (81%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
L
Sparta (49%)
L
Fortuna (56%)
L
NEC (69%)
Cremonese logo Cremonese
W
Pisa (40%)
L
Lazio (70%)
L
Napoli (79%)
D
Torino (69%)
L
Cagliari (58%)
L
Bologna (58%)
W
Parma (62%)
L
Fiorentina (66%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Excelsior A
1 - 1 D
60%
Heerenveen H
0 - 2 L
67%
Heracles A
2 - 0 W
41%
Twente A
1 - 2 L
81%
Feyenoord H
0 - 0 D
67%
Sparta A
0 - 2 L
49%
Fortuna H
1 - 2 L
56%
NEC A
0 - 3 L
69%
Groningen H
3 - 2 W
61%
NAC A
0 - 1 L
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pisa H
3 - 0 W
40%
Lazio H
1 - 2 L
70%
Napoli A
0 - 4 L
79%
Torino H
0 - 0 D
69%
Cagliari A
0 - 1 L
58%
Bologna H
1 - 2 L
58%
Parma A
2 - 0 W
62%
Fiorentina H
1 - 4 L
66%
Lecce A
1 - 2 L
58%
AC Milan H
0 - 2 L
60%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.2 vs 57.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Volendam averaging 0.8 and Cremonese averaging 0.9 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Volendam conceding 1.5 and Cremonese conceding 1.7 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.4 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Volendam

Volendam

VS
Cremonese

Cremonese

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more