Skip to content
Compare Volendam vs Napredak

Volendam vs Napredak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Volendam vs Napredak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Volendam Volendam Home Team
Napredak Napredak Away Team
Volendam
36.2
D L W L D L L L W L

Last 10 Matches

Napredak
25.8
W L L L L L L L D L

Categories Won

8

Volendam

5

Draw

2

Napredak

Performance Radar

Volendam
Napredak

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 2D, 6L

10%

1W, 1D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Mühren (3 goals)
N. Bogdanovski (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.2

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 60.5

41.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.77

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.03

0.82

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
36.2

Attack: 27.5, Defense: 51.6, Form: 20.6

25.8

Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

3
Volendam
Napredak
Volendam

Power Rating Breakdown

36.2

Overall

Attack 27.5
Defense 51.6
Form 20.6
Consistency 59.2
Napredak

Power Rating Breakdown

25.8

Overall

Attack 24.4
Defense 18.3
Form 9.1
Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

60.5 vs 55.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Volendam logo Volendam
D
Excelsior (60%)
L
Heerenveen (67%)
W
Heracles (41%)
L
Twente (81%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
L
Sparta (49%)
L
Fortuna (56%)
L
NEC (69%)
Napredak logo Napredak
W
Spartak (33%)
L
Radnički Niš (44%)
L
Javor (56%)
L
FK IMT (58%)
L
TSC (60%)
L
Mladost Lučani (53%)
L
TSC (56%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Excelsior A
1 - 1 D
60%
Heerenveen H
0 - 2 L
67%
Heracles A
2 - 0 W
41%
Twente A
1 - 2 L
81%
Feyenoord H
0 - 0 D
67%
Sparta A
0 - 2 L
49%
Fortuna H
1 - 2 L
56%
NEC A
0 - 3 L
69%
Groningen H
3 - 2 W
61%
NAC A
0 - 1 L
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Spartak A
3 - 0 W
33%
Radnički Niš H
0 - 1 L
44%
Javor A
0 - 4 L
56%
FK IMT H
0 - 1 L
58%
TSC A
1 - 4 L
60%
Mladost Lučani A
0 - 2 L
53%
TSC H
1 - 2 L
56%
Vojvodina A
1 - 4 L
68%
OFK H
2 - 2 D
53%
Red Star A
0 - 4 L
74%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Volendam has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.2) compared to Napredak (SoS: 41.4). This means Volendam's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Volendam averaging 0.8 and Napredak averaging 0.8 goals per match.

Defensively, Volendam is far superior, conceding just 1.5 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Napredak leaks 2.4 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Volendam has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Volendam

Volendam

VS
Napredak

Napredak

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more