Skip to content
Compare Volos vs Malmö

Volos vs Malmö Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Volos vs Malmö: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Volos Volos Home Team
Malmö Malmö Away Team
Volos
34.6
L L L D W L D D L D

Last 10 Matches

Malmö
39.9
L L W L W W D L L L

Categories Won

2

Volos

3

Draw

10

Malmö

Performance Radar

Volos
Malmö

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 4D, 5L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-9

-9

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Hurtado (2 goals)
S. Hakšabanović (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.4

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 51.6

45.2

League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.2

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: 0.0

1.44

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
34.6

Attack: 41.4, Defense: 31.0, Form: 10.3

39.9

Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

3
Volos
Malmö
Volos

Power Rating Breakdown

34.6

Overall

Attack 41.4
Defense 31.0
Form 10.3
Consistency 75.7
Malmö

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 44.4
Defense 44.4
Form 28.6
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

56.0 vs 60.5

Opponent Quality

51.6 vs 60.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Volos logo Volos
L
Levadiakos (44%)
L
Levadiakos (49%)
L
Aris (58%)
D
OFI (44%)
W
PAOK (54%)
L
Kifisia (54%)
D
OFI (44%)
D
AEK Athens (62%)
Malmö logo Malmö
L
Häcken (58%)
L
Mjällby (54%)
W
AIK (49%)
L
Sirius (65%)
W
Djurgården (59%)
W
GAIS (47%)
D
Örgryte (41%)
L
Genk (70%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Levadiakos H
0 - 3 L
44%
Levadiakos A
2 - 5 L
49%
Aris A
2 - 3 L
58%
OFI H
1 - 1 D
44%
PAOK H
2 - 1 W
54%
Kifisia A
0 - 2 L
54%
OFI H
1 - 1 D
44%
AEK Athens H
2 - 2 D
62%
Panserraikos A
1 - 2 L
54%
Aris H
1 - 1 D
53%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Häcken A
2 - 3 L
58%
Mjällby H
2 - 3 L
54%
AIK A
1 - 0 W
49%
Sirius H
2 - 3 L
65%
Djurgården A
1 - 0 W
59%
GAIS H
3 - 1 W
47%
Örgryte A
1 - 1 D
41%
Genk A
1 - 2 L
70%
Red Star H
0 - 1 L
81%
Porto A
1 - 2 L
77%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.4 vs 45.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Volos averaging 1.2 and Malmö averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Malmö has the defensive edge, conceding 1.6 per match compared to Volos's 2.1.

Volos has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Malmö has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Volos

Volos

VS
Malmö

Malmö

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more