Skip to content
Compare Volos vs Sønderjyske

Volos vs Sønderjyske Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Volos vs Sønderjyske: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Volos Volos Home Team
Sønderjyske Sønderjyske Away Team
Volos
34.6
L L L D W L D D L D

Last 10 Matches

Sønderjyske
38.5
W L W L L L D L D W

Categories Won

4

Volos

2

Draw

9

Sønderjyske

Performance Radar

Volos
Sønderjyske

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 4D, 5L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-9

-9

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Hurtado (2 goals)
O. Hyseni (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.4

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 51.6

54.2

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.2

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: 0.0

0.84

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.16

Adjusted Power Rating
34.6

Attack: 41.4, Defense: 31.0, Form: 10.3

38.5

Attack: 34.7, Defense: 45.2, Form: 31.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

4
Volos
Sønderjyske
Volos

Power Rating Breakdown

34.6

Overall

Attack 41.4
Defense 31.0
Form 10.3
Consistency 75.7
Sønderjyske

Power Rating Breakdown

38.5

Overall

Attack 34.7
Defense 45.2
Form 31.3
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

56.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

51.6 vs 53.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Volos logo Volos
L
Levadiakos (44%)
L
Levadiakos (49%)
L
Aris (58%)
D
OFI (44%)
W
PAOK (54%)
L
Kifisia (54%)
D
OFI (44%)
D
AEK Athens (62%)
Sønderjyske logo Sønderjyske
W
Viborg (55%)
L
AGF (62%)
W
Brøndby (44%)
L
Midtjylland (52%)
L
Brøndby (49%)
L
Viborg (50%)
D
Midtjylland (57%)
L
Nordsjælland (60%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Levadiakos H
0 - 3 L
44%
Levadiakos A
2 - 5 L
49%
Aris A
2 - 3 L
58%
OFI H
1 - 1 D
44%
PAOK H
2 - 1 W
54%
Kifisia A
0 - 2 L
54%
OFI H
1 - 1 D
44%
AEK Athens H
2 - 2 D
62%
Panserraikos A
1 - 2 L
54%
Aris H
1 - 1 D
53%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Viborg A
1 - 0 W
55%
AGF A
1 - 2 L
62%
Brøndby H
3 - 0 W
44%
Midtjylland H
1 - 2 L
52%
Brøndby A
0 - 6 L
49%
Viborg H
0 - 2 L
50%
Midtjylland A
2 - 2 D
57%
Nordsjælland A
0 - 2 L
60%
AGF H
1 - 1 D
57%
OB H
1 - 0 W
50%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.4 vs 54.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Volos averaging 1.2 and Sønderjyske averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Sønderjyske has the defensive edge, conceding 1.7 per match compared to Volos's 2.1.

Volos has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Sønderjyske has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Volos

Volos

VS
Sønderjyske

Sønderjyske

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more