Compare Westerlo vs Javor

Westerlo vs Javor Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Westerlo vs Javor: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Westerlo Home Team

Javor Away Team

Westerlo

45.7

L D L W L W W D L W

Last 10 Matches

Javor

46.5

L D W L W L W D D W

Categories Won

Westerlo

Draw

Javor

Performance Radar

Westerlo

Javor

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match

1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-1

Clean Sheet

40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

Nacho Ferri (4 goals)

A. Radonjić (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 11

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 6

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

51.3

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 54.9

49.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 45.6

Elite Opponent Record

33%

1W / 3 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.42

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.02

1.17

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.13

Adjusted Power Rating

45.7

Attack: 47.3, Defense: 50.6, Form: 40.5

46.5

Attack: 43.1, Defense: 56.3, Form: 39.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Westerlo

Javor

Power Rating Breakdown

45.7

Overall

Attack 47.3

Defense 50.6

Form 40.5

Consistency 44.8

Power Rating Breakdown

46.5

Overall

Attack 43.1

Defense 56.3

Form 39.8

Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.5 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

54.9 vs 45.6

Elite Opponent Record

33% vs 0%

Westerlo

Javor

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Genk A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 3 L

54%

OHL H

Belgian First Division A

3 - 3 D

35%

Antwerp H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 4 L

40%

OHL A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

40%

Genk H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

49%

Standard A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

72%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 0 W

57%

Standard A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

72%

Club Brugge H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

78%

OHL A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

52%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

TSC A

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 6 L

60%

FK IMT H

Serbian Super Liga

0 - 0 D

58%

Napredak H

Serbian Super Liga

4 - 0 W

29%

Radnički Niš A

Serbian Super Liga

2 - 3 L

49%

Spartak H

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 0 W

28%

Železničar P H

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 2 L

57%

Spartak A

Serbian Super Liga

2 - 1 W

33%

Novi Pazar H

Serbian Super Liga

0 - 0 D

41%

Radnik A

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 1 D

55%

Čukarički H

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 0 W

46%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 51.3 vs 49.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Westerlo averaging 1.4 and Javor averaging 1.3 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Westerlo conceding 1.5 and Javor conceding 1.3 per match.

Westerlo has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Javor has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Westerlo is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Westerlo

Javor

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair