Compare Westerlo vs NAC

Westerlo vs NAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Westerlo vs NAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Westerlo Home Team

NAC Away Team

Westerlo

45.7

L D L W L W W D L W

Last 10 Matches

NAC

33.2

W L L D D L L D L W

Categories Won

Westerlo

Draw

NAC

Performance Radar

Westerlo

NAC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match

1.4

14 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-1

-11

Clean Sheet

40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

Nacho Ferri (4 goals)

M. Nassoh (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 11

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

51.3

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 54.9

53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

Elite Opponent Record

33%

1W / 3 matches

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.42

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.02

0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

Adjusted Power Rating

45.7

Attack: 47.3, Defense: 50.6, Form: 40.5

33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Westerlo

NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

45.7

Overall

Attack 47.3

Defense 50.6

Form 40.5

Consistency 44.8

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7

Defense 38.1

Form 20.8

Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.5 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

54.9 vs 62.3

Elite Opponent Record

33% vs 0%

Westerlo

NAC

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Genk A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 3 L

54%

OHL H

Belgian First Division A

3 - 3 D

35%

Antwerp H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 4 L

40%

OHL A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

40%

Genk H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

49%

Standard A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

72%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 0 W

57%

Standard A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

72%

Club Brugge H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

78%

OHL A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

52%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

67%

Utrecht A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

75%

Ajax H

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

62%

Fortuna A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

61%

Sparta H

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 0 D

44%

Zwolle A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

59%

Go Ahead A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 6 L

70%

Feyenoord H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 3 D

67%

Telstar A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 3 L

69%

Volendam H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 0 W

49%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 51.3 vs 53.8), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Westerlo holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus NAC's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Westerlo has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to NAC's 1.9.

Westerlo has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Westerlo is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Westerlo has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Westerlo

NAC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair