Skip to content
Compare Zorya vs Tromsø

Zorya vs Tromsø Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Zorya vs Tromsø: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Zorya Zorya Home Team
Tromsø Tromsø Away Team
Zorya
64.3
W D W W L L W D D W

Last 10 Matches

Tromsø
64.8
W D L W W D W W W W

Categories Won

6

Zorya

2

Draw

7

Tromsø

Performance Radar

Zorya
Tromsø

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 3D, 2L

70%

7W, 2D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+6

+6

+9

+9

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
P. Budkivskyi (5 goals)
J. Hjertø-Dahl (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 12
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

71%

5W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
67.3

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 66.0

48.0

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 46.7

Elite Opponent Record
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.1

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.3

1.56

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
64.3

Attack: 70.4, Defense: 70.4, Form: 58.7

64.8

Attack: 55.5, Defense: 71.9, Form: 68.6

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

1
7

46-60'

5
2

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

3
Zorya
Tromsø
Zorya

Power Rating Breakdown

64.3

Overall

Attack 70.4
Defense 70.4
Form 58.7
Consistency 53.2
Tromsø

Power Rating Breakdown

64.8

Overall

Attack 55.5
Defense 71.9
Form 68.6
Consistency 63.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

98.0 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

66.0 vs 46.7

Elite Opponent Record

20% vs 0%
Zorya logo Zorya
W
Oleksandria (49%)
D
Metalist 1925 (74%)
W
Rukh Vynnyky (49%)
W
Veres Rivne (62%)
L
Shakhtar D (78%)
L
Dynamo Kyiv (83%)
W
Epitsentr (74%)
D
Obolon (63%)
Tromsø logo Tromsø
W
Molde (52%)
D
Start (40%)
L
Brann (45%)
W
Sandefjord (50%)
W
Sarpsborg (47%)
D
Lillestrøm (57%)
W
Kristiansund (45%)
W
Rosenborg (42%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Oleksandria A
2 - 1 W
49%
Metalist 1925 H
1 - 1 D
74%
Rukh Vynnyky A
2 - 1 W
49%
Veres Rivne H
2 - 0 W
62%
Shakhtar D H
1 - 2 L
78%
Dynamo Kyiv A
1 - 3 L
83%
Epitsentr H
1 - 0 W
74%
Obolon A
3 - 3 D
63%
Kolos A
1 - 1 D
83%
SK Poltava H
4 - 0 W
45%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Molde H
2 - 0 W
52%
Start A
1 - 1 D
40%
Brann H
0 - 5 L
45%
Sandefjord H
3 - 1 W
50%
Sarpsborg A
1 - 0 W
47%
Lillestrøm H
0 - 0 D
57%
Kristiansund H
2 - 0 W
45%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
42%
Brann A
2 - 1 W
50%
Fredrikstad H
4 - 0 W
39%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Zorya has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.3) compared to Tromsø (SoS: 48.0). This means Zorya's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Zorya averaging 1.8 and Tromsø averaging 1.7 goals per match.

Tromsø has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Zorya's 1.2.

Zorya has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Tromsø has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Tromsø is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Zorya

Zorya

VS
Tromsø

Tromsø

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more