Compare ZW vs Como

ZW vs Como Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare ZW vs Como: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

ZW Home Team

Como Away Team

60.1

W W W W W D W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Como

62.2

W D W L L L D W W W

Categories Won

Draw

Como

Performance Radar

Como

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match

1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

J. Opoku (5 goals)

T. Douvikas (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11

1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10

Home Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

55.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 50.7

63.4

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 65.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

2.05

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25

Adjusted Power Rating

60.1

Attack: 59.7, Defense: 66.8, Form: 63.2

62.2

Attack: 68.0, Defense: 71.8, Form: 56.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Como

Power Rating Breakdown

60.1

Overall

Attack 59.7

Defense 66.8

Form 63.2

Consistency 43.3

Power Rating Breakdown

62.2

Overall

Attack 68.0

Defense 71.8

Form 56.7

Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 85.5

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 65.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 25%

Como

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Dender H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

35%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

3 - 2 W

51%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

4 - 0 W

38%

La Louvière A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

42%

Dender A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

58%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

57%

Gent A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

63%

Standard H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 1 L

67%

Mechelen A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

45%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Verona A

Italian Serie A

1 - 0 W

55%

Napoli H

Italian Serie A

0 - 0 D

74%

Genoa A

Italian Serie A

2 - 0 W

67%

Inter Milan A

Coppa Italia

2 - 3 L

66%

Sassuolo A

Italian Serie A

1 - 2 L

69%

Inter Milan H

Italian Serie A

3 - 4 L

78%

Udinese A

Italian Serie A

0 - 0 D

79%

Pisa H

Italian Serie A

5 - 0 W

40%

Roma H

Italian Serie A

2 - 1 W

70%

Cagliari A

Italian Serie A

2 - 1 W

58%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.4 vs 63.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with ZW averaging 1.7 and Como averaging 1.8 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with ZW conceding 1.1 and Como conceding 1.1 per match.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

ZW is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Como

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair