Skip to content
Compare ZW vs LNZ Cherkasy

ZW vs LNZ Cherkasy Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare ZW vs LNZ Cherkasy: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

ZW ZW Home Team
LNZ Cherkasy LNZ Cherkasy Away Team
ZW
60.1
W W W W W D W L L L

Last 10 Matches

LNZ Cherkasy
60.7
D D D L D W W W W L

Categories Won

7

ZW

3

Draw

5

LNZ Cherkasy

Performance Radar

ZW
LNZ Cherkasy

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 1D, 3L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+6

+6

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Opoku (5 goals)
M. Assinor (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 50.7

67.6

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 71.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

14%

1W / 7 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

1.53

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.13

Adjusted Power Rating
60.1

Attack: 59.7, Defense: 66.8, Form: 63.2

60.7

Attack: 54.9, Defense: 86.2, Form: 47.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

3
5

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

5
ZW
LNZ Cherkasy
ZW

Power Rating Breakdown

60.1

Overall

Attack 59.7
Defense 66.8
Form 63.2
Consistency 43.3
LNZ Cherkasy

Power Rating Breakdown

60.7

Overall

Attack 54.9
Defense 86.2
Form 47.0
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 71.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 14%
ZW logo ZW
W
Dender (35%)
W
Cercle Brugge (51%)
W
La Louvière (38%)
W
La Louvière (42%)
W
Dender (51%)
D
Cercle Brugge (58%)
W
Charleroi (57%)
L
Gent (63%)
LNZ Cherkasy logo LNZ Cherkasy
D
Dynamo Kyiv (78%)
D
Karpaty Lviv (86%)
D
Metalist 1925 (74%)
L
Kolos (83%)
D
Shakhtar D (78%)
W
Kryvbas KR (76%)
W
Rukh Vynnyky (49%)
W
Oleksandria (44%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dender H
2 - 1 W
35%
Cercle Brugge A
3 - 2 W
51%
La Louvière H
4 - 0 W
38%
La Louvière A
2 - 0 W
42%
Dender A
2 - 1 W
51%
Cercle Brugge H
2 - 2 D
58%
Charleroi H
1 - 0 W
57%
Gent A
0 - 2 L
63%
Standard H
0 - 1 L
67%
Mechelen A
1 - 2 L
45%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dynamo Kyiv H
0 - 0 D
78%
Karpaty Lviv A
0 - 0 D
86%
Metalist 1925 H
1 - 1 D
74%
Kolos A
0 - 1 L
83%
Shakhtar D H
2 - 2 D
78%
Kryvbas KR A
3 - 0 W
76%
Rukh Vynnyky A
2 - 1 W
49%
Oleksandria H
2 - 0 W
44%
Veres Rivne A
3 - 0 W
67%
Polissya H
1 - 3 L
77%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

LNZ Cherkasy has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.6) compared to ZW (SoS: 55.4). This means LNZ Cherkasy's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

ZW holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus LNZ Cherkasy's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

LNZ Cherkasy has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to ZW's 1.1.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

LNZ Cherkasy has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

LNZ Cherkasy is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

ZW

ZW

VS
LNZ Cherkasy

LNZ Cherkasy

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more