Compare ZW vs Randers

ZW vs Randers Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare ZW vs Randers: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

ZW Home Team

Randers Away Team

60.1

W W W W W D W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Randers

42.7

D W L D L L D L W W

Categories Won

Draw

Randers

Performance Radar

Randers

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match

1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-3

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

J. Opoku (5 goals)

E. Mahmoud (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 8

Home Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

55.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 50.7

53.1

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.9

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

1.15

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating

60.1

Attack: 59.7, Defense: 66.8, Form: 63.2

42.7

Attack: 44.7, Defense: 48.1, Form: 30.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Randers

Power Rating Breakdown

60.1

Overall

Attack 59.7

Defense 66.8

Form 63.2

Consistency 43.3

Power Rating Breakdown

42.7

Overall

Attack 44.7

Defense 48.1

Form 30.9

Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 51.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Randers

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Dender H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

35%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

3 - 2 W

51%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

4 - 0 W

38%

La Louvière A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

42%

Dender A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

58%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

57%

Gent A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

63%

Standard H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 1 L

67%

Mechelen A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

45%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

OB H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 2 D

50%

Vejle H

Danish Superligaen

1 - 0 W

39%

Silkeborg A

Danish Superligaen

0 - 2 L

57%

Fredericia H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 2 D

43%

OB A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 3 L

55%

Copenhagen H

Danish Superligaen

1 - 2 L

63%

Vejle A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

44%

Silkeborg H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 3 L

52%

Fredericia A

Danish Superligaen

3 - 0 W

48%

Copenhagen A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

68%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.4 vs 53.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

ZW holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Randers's 1.3, though the gap is not insurmountable.

ZW has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Randers's 1.6.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Randers has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

ZW is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

ZW emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (60.1 vs 42.7) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Randers

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair