Skip to content
Compare ZW vs Tromsø

ZW vs Tromsø Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare ZW vs Tromsø: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

ZW ZW Home Team
Tromsø Tromsø Away Team
ZW
60.1
W W W W W D W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Tromsø
64.8
W D L W W D W W W W

Categories Won

4

ZW

4

Draw

7

Tromsø

Performance Radar

ZW
Tromsø

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 1D, 3L

70%

7W, 2D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+6

+6

+9

+9

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Opoku (5 goals)
J. Hjertø-Dahl (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

71%

5W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 50.7

48.0

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 46.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

1.56

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
60.1

Attack: 59.7, Defense: 66.8, Form: 63.2

64.8

Attack: 55.5, Defense: 71.9, Form: 68.6

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

5
5

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

3
ZW
Tromsø
ZW

Power Rating Breakdown

60.1

Overall

Attack 59.7
Defense 66.8
Form 63.2
Consistency 43.3
Tromsø

Power Rating Breakdown

64.8

Overall

Attack 55.5
Defense 71.9
Form 68.6
Consistency 63.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 46.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
ZW logo ZW
W
Dender (35%)
W
Cercle Brugge (51%)
W
La Louvière (38%)
W
La Louvière (42%)
W
Dender (51%)
D
Cercle Brugge (58%)
W
Charleroi (57%)
L
Gent (63%)
Tromsø logo Tromsø
W
Molde (52%)
D
Start (40%)
L
Brann (45%)
W
Sandefjord (50%)
W
Sarpsborg (47%)
D
Lillestrøm (57%)
W
Kristiansund (45%)
W
Rosenborg (42%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dender H
2 - 1 W
35%
Cercle Brugge A
3 - 2 W
51%
La Louvière H
4 - 0 W
38%
La Louvière A
2 - 0 W
42%
Dender A
2 - 1 W
51%
Cercle Brugge H
2 - 2 D
58%
Charleroi H
1 - 0 W
57%
Gent A
0 - 2 L
63%
Standard H
0 - 1 L
67%
Mechelen A
1 - 2 L
45%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Molde H
2 - 0 W
52%
Start A
1 - 1 D
40%
Brann H
0 - 5 L
45%
Sandefjord H
3 - 1 W
50%
Sarpsborg A
1 - 0 W
47%
Lillestrøm H
0 - 0 D
57%
Kristiansund H
2 - 0 W
45%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
42%
Brann A
2 - 1 W
50%
Fredrikstad H
4 - 0 W
39%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.4 vs 48.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with ZW averaging 1.7 and Tromsø averaging 1.7 goals per match.

Tromsø has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to ZW's 1.1.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Tromsø has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Tromsø is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

ZW

ZW

VS
Tromsø

Tromsø

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more