Skip to content
Compare ZW vs Železničar P

ZW vs Železničar P Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare ZW vs Železničar P: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

ZW ZW Home Team
Železničar P Železničar P Away Team
ZW
60.1
W W W W W D W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Železničar P
57.4
D W D D L W W L W D

Categories Won

7

ZW

5

Draw

3

Železničar P

Performance Radar

ZW
Železničar P

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 1D, 3L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+6

+6

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Opoku (5 goals)
K. Karikari (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 50.7

55.1

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

1.64

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
60.1

Attack: 59.7, Defense: 66.8, Form: 63.2

57.4

Attack: 59.6, Defense: 73.6, Form: 42.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

3
5

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

6
ZW
Železničar P
ZW

Power Rating Breakdown

60.1

Overall

Attack 59.7
Defense 66.8
Form 63.2
Consistency 43.3
Železničar P

Power Rating Breakdown

57.4

Overall

Attack 59.6
Defense 73.6
Form 42.0
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 55.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
ZW logo ZW
W
Dender (35%)
W
Cercle Brugge (51%)
W
La Louvière (38%)
W
La Louvière (42%)
W
Dender (51%)
D
Cercle Brugge (58%)
W
Charleroi (57%)
L
Gent (63%)
Železničar P logo Železničar P
D
Radnik (50%)
W
OFK (53%)
D
Vojvodina (68%)
D
Red Star (69%)
L
Partizan (57%)
W
Javor (56%)
W
Novi Pazar (41%)
L
Čukarički (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dender H
2 - 1 W
35%
Cercle Brugge A
3 - 2 W
51%
La Louvière H
4 - 0 W
38%
La Louvière A
2 - 0 W
42%
Dender A
2 - 1 W
51%
Cercle Brugge H
2 - 2 D
58%
Charleroi H
1 - 0 W
57%
Gent A
0 - 2 L
63%
Standard H
0 - 1 L
67%
Mechelen A
1 - 2 L
45%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Radnik H
1 - 1 D
50%
OFK H
2 - 0 W
53%
Vojvodina A
0 - 0 D
68%
Red Star H
2 - 2 D
69%
Partizan A
1 - 2 L
57%
Javor A
2 - 1 W
56%
Novi Pazar H
2 - 0 W
41%
Čukarički A
2 - 3 L
50%
Mladost Lučani H
5 - 0 W
48%
TSC A
0 - 0 D
60%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.4 vs 55.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with ZW averaging 1.7 and Železničar P averaging 1.7 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with ZW conceding 1.1 and Železničar P conceding 0.9 per match.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Železničar P has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

ZW is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

ZW

ZW

VS
Železničar P

Železničar P

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more