Skip to content
Compare Zürich vs Aris

Zürich vs Aris Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Zürich vs Aris: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Zürich Zürich Home Team
Aris Aris Away Team
Zürich
35.3
L W D L L L W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Aris
46.8
W W W D L D D L D D

Categories Won

2

Zürich

4

Draw

9

Aris

Performance Radar

Zürich
Aris

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 1D, 7L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Ivan Cavaleiro (3 goals)
B. Garré (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.4

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 49.7

51.4

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 48.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.9

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.1

1.32

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
35.3

Attack: 33.1, Defense: 43.1, Form: 19.9

46.8

Attack: 40.6, Defense: 64.2, Form: 30.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

1
5

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

3
Zürich
Aris
Zürich

Power Rating Breakdown

35.3

Overall

Attack 33.1
Defense 43.1
Form 19.9
Consistency 57.7
Aris

Power Rating Breakdown

46.8

Overall

Attack 40.6
Defense 64.2
Form 30.4
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.0 vs 56.0

Opponent Quality

49.7 vs 48.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Zürich logo Zürich
L
Luzern (56%)
W
GC Zürich (31%)
D
Winterthur (46%)
L
Lausanne (47%)
L
Lugano (50%)
L
St.Gallen (60%)
W
Thun (44%)
L
Sion (62%)
Aris logo Aris
W
OFI (44%)
W
OFI (49%)
W
Volos (39%)
D
Levadiakos (49%)
L
OFI (44%)
D
Panserraikos (54%)
D
Atromitos (54%)
L
Panathinaikos (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Luzern A
0 - 1 L
56%
GC Zürich H
2 - 1 W
31%
Winterthur A
2 - 2 D
46%
Lausanne A
0 - 3 L
47%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
50%
St.Gallen A
1 - 2 L
60%
Thun H
2 - 1 W
44%
Sion H
1 - 2 L
62%
Servette A
1 - 2 L
63%
Lausanne H
1 - 2 L
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
OFI H
3 - 1 W
44%
OFI A
2 - 0 W
49%
Volos H
3 - 2 W
39%
Levadiakos A
1 - 1 D
49%
OFI H
0 - 2 L
44%
Panserraikos A
0 - 0 D
54%
Atromitos H
0 - 0 D
54%
Panathinaikos A
1 - 3 L
57%
Kifisia H
1 - 1 D
49%
Volos A
1 - 1 D
44%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.4 vs 51.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Zürich averaging 1.0 and Aris averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Aris has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Zürich's 1.7.

Zürich has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Aris has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Aris has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Zürich

Zürich

VS
Aris

Aris

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more