Skip to content
Compare Zürich vs WAC

Zürich vs WAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Zürich vs WAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Zürich Zürich Home Team
WAC WAC Away Team
Zürich
35.5
L W D L L L W L L L

Last 10 Matches

WAC
41.5
W W W L D D L D L L

Categories Won

5

Zürich

2

Draw

8

WAC

Performance Radar

Zürich
WAC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 1D, 7L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Ivan Cavaleiro (3 goals)
D. Baumgartner (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.9

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 50.5

54.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.9

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.1

0.97

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
35.5

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 43.3, Form: 20.0

41.5

Attack: 31.3, Defense: 59.1, Form: 31.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

1
5

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

2
Zürich
WAC
Zürich

Power Rating Breakdown

35.5

Overall

Attack 33.3
Defense 43.3
Form 20.0
Consistency 57.7
WAC

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 31.3
Defense 59.1
Form 31.3
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

50.5 vs 53.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Zürich logo Zürich
L
Luzern (61%)
W
GC Zürich (31%)
D
Winterthur (46%)
L
Lausanne (47%)
L
Lugano (50%)
L
St.Gallen (60%)
W
Thun (44%)
L
Sion (62%)
WAC logo WAC
W
Ried (55%)
W
Altach (48%)
W
GAK (53%)
L
BW Linz (60%)
D
BW Linz (55%)
D
Ried (50%)
L
WSG Tirol (48%)
D
Altach (43%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Luzern A
0 - 1 L
61%
GC Zürich H
2 - 1 W
31%
Winterthur A
2 - 2 D
46%
Lausanne A
0 - 3 L
47%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
50%
St.Gallen A
1 - 2 L
60%
Thun H
2 - 1 W
44%
Sion H
1 - 2 L
62%
Servette A
1 - 2 L
66%
Lausanne H
1 - 2 L
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ried A
1 - 0 W
55%
Altach A
4 - 1 W
48%
GAK H
1 - 0 W
53%
BW Linz A
0 - 3 L
60%
BW Linz H
0 - 0 D
55%
Ried H
0 - 0 D
50%
WSG Tirol A
1 - 3 L
48%
Altach H
1 - 1 D
43%
GAK A
0 - 2 L
58%
LASK A
1 - 3 L
69%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.9 vs 54.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Zürich averaging 1.0 and WAC averaging 0.9 goals per match.

WAC has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Zürich's 1.7.

Zürich has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

WAC has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

WAC has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Zürich

Zürich

VS
WAC

WAC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more