Compare AGF vs Hajduk

AGF vs Hajduk Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AGF vs Hajduk: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AGF Home Team

Hajduk Away Team

AGF

52.9

W W D D L D W D D W

Last 10 Matches

Hajduk

48.5

L W D L D W W W W L

Categories Won

AGF

Draw

Hajduk

Performance Radar

AGF

Hajduk

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

T. Bech (2 goals)

M. Livaja (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6

1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8

Home Win Rate

25%

1W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

50%

3W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

52.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

35.3

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.4

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

1.55

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.25

Adjusted Power Rating

52.9

Attack: 41.0, Defense: 75.1, Form: 41.0

48.5

Attack: 51.2, Defense: 54.0, Form: 42.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

AGF

Hajduk

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 41.0

Defense 75.1

Form 41.0

Consistency 63.7

Power Rating Breakdown

48.5

Overall

Attack 51.2

Defense 54.0

Form 42.6

Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 49.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

AGF

Hajduk

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Brøndby A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 0 W

49%

Sønderjyske H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

43%

Midtjylland H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

52%

Nordsjælland A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

60%

Midtjylland A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 2 L

57%

Nordsjælland H

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

55%

Viborg A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

55%

Brøndby H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

44%

Sønderjyske A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

48%

Vejle A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

44%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Dinamo Zagreb A

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 2 L

76%

Varaždin H

Croatia Prva HNL

3 - 1 W

48%

Rijeka A

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 0 D

48%

Osijek H

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 1 L

40%

Slaven A

Croatia Prva HNL

2 - 2 D

40%

Gorica H

Croatia Prva HNL

1 - 0 W

44%

Istra A

Croatia Prva HNL

3 - 1 W

46%

Vukovar A

Croatia Prva HNL

6 - 0 W

37%

Lokomotiva H

Croatia Prva HNL

2 - 1 W

44%

Dinamo Zagreb H

Croatia Prva HNL

1 - 3 L

71%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

AGF has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 52.4) compared to Hajduk (SoS: 35.3). This means AGF's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Hajduk holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus AGF's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

AGF has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Hajduk's 1.1.

AGF has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AGF

Hajduk

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair