Skip to content
Compare AGF vs LNZ Cherkasy

AGF vs LNZ Cherkasy Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AGF vs LNZ Cherkasy: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AGF AGF Home Team
LNZ Cherkasy LNZ Cherkasy Away Team
AGF
52.9
W W D D L D W D D W

Last 10 Matches

LNZ Cherkasy
60.7
D D D L D W W W W L

Categories Won

2

AGF

3

Draw

10

LNZ Cherkasy

Performance Radar

AGF
LNZ Cherkasy

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Bech (2 goals)
M. Assinor (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

67.6

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 71.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

14%

1W / 7 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

1.53

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.13

Adjusted Power Rating
52.9

Attack: 41.0, Defense: 75.1, Form: 41.0

60.7

Attack: 54.9, Defense: 86.2, Form: 47.0

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

5
AGF
LNZ Cherkasy
AGF

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 41.0
Defense 75.1
Form 41.0
Consistency 63.7
LNZ Cherkasy

Power Rating Breakdown

60.7

Overall

Attack 54.9
Defense 86.2
Form 47.0
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 71.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 14%
AGF logo AGF
W
Brøndby (49%)
W
Sønderjyske (43%)
D
Midtjylland (52%)
D
Nordsjælland (60%)
L
Midtjylland (57%)
D
Nordsjælland (55%)
W
Viborg (55%)
D
Brøndby (44%)
LNZ Cherkasy logo LNZ Cherkasy
D
Dynamo Kyiv (78%)
D
Karpaty Lviv (86%)
D
Metalist 1925 (74%)
L
Kolos (83%)
D
Shakhtar D (78%)
W
Kryvbas KR (76%)
W
Rukh Vynnyky (49%)
W
Oleksandria (44%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brøndby A
2 - 0 W
49%
Sønderjyske H
2 - 1 W
43%
Midtjylland H
0 - 0 D
52%
Nordsjælland A
1 - 1 D
60%
Midtjylland A
1 - 2 L
57%
Nordsjælland H
1 - 1 D
55%
Viborg A
2 - 1 W
55%
Brøndby H
0 - 0 D
44%
Sønderjyske A
1 - 1 D
48%
Vejle A
2 - 1 W
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dynamo Kyiv H
0 - 0 D
78%
Karpaty Lviv A
0 - 0 D
86%
Metalist 1925 H
1 - 1 D
74%
Kolos A
0 - 1 L
83%
Shakhtar D H
2 - 2 D
78%
Kryvbas KR A
3 - 0 W
76%
Rukh Vynnyky A
2 - 1 W
49%
Oleksandria H
2 - 0 W
44%
Veres Rivne A
3 - 0 W
67%
Polissya H
1 - 3 L
77%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

LNZ Cherkasy has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.6) compared to AGF (SoS: 52.4). This means LNZ Cherkasy's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with AGF averaging 1.2 and LNZ Cherkasy averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with AGF conceding 0.8 and LNZ Cherkasy conceding 0.8 per match.

AGF has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

LNZ Cherkasy has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

LNZ Cherkasy is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.1 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

LNZ Cherkasy has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AGF

AGF

VS
LNZ Cherkasy

LNZ Cherkasy

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more