Skip to content
Compare AGF vs Napredak

AGF vs Napredak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AGF vs Napredak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AGF AGF Home Team
Napredak Napredak Away Team
AGF
52.9
W W D D L D W D D W

Last 10 Matches

Napredak
25.8
W L L L L L L L D L

Categories Won

11

AGF

3

Draw

1

Napredak

Performance Radar

AGF
Napredak

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

10%

1W, 1D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Bech (2 goals)
N. Bogdanovski (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

41.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

0.82

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
52.9

Attack: 41.0, Defense: 75.1, Form: 41.0

25.8

Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

2

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

3
AGF
Napredak
AGF

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 41.0
Defense 75.1
Form 41.0
Consistency 63.7
Napredak

Power Rating Breakdown

25.8

Overall

Attack 24.4
Defense 18.3
Form 9.1
Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 55.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
AGF logo AGF
W
Brøndby (49%)
W
Sønderjyske (43%)
D
Midtjylland (52%)
D
Nordsjælland (60%)
L
Midtjylland (57%)
D
Nordsjælland (55%)
W
Viborg (55%)
D
Brøndby (44%)
Napredak logo Napredak
W
Spartak (33%)
L
Radnički Niš (44%)
L
Javor (56%)
L
FK IMT (58%)
L
TSC (60%)
L
Mladost Lučani (53%)
L
TSC (56%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brøndby A
2 - 0 W
49%
Sønderjyske H
2 - 1 W
43%
Midtjylland H
0 - 0 D
52%
Nordsjælland A
1 - 1 D
60%
Midtjylland A
1 - 2 L
57%
Nordsjælland H
1 - 1 D
55%
Viborg A
2 - 1 W
55%
Brøndby H
0 - 0 D
44%
Sønderjyske A
1 - 1 D
48%
Vejle A
2 - 1 W
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Spartak A
3 - 0 W
33%
Radnički Niš H
0 - 1 L
44%
Javor A
0 - 4 L
56%
FK IMT H
0 - 1 L
58%
TSC A
1 - 4 L
60%
Mladost Lučani A
0 - 2 L
53%
TSC H
1 - 2 L
56%
Vojvodina A
1 - 4 L
68%
OFK H
2 - 2 D
53%
Red Star A
0 - 4 L
74%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

AGF has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 52.4) compared to Napredak (SoS: 41.4). This means AGF's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

AGF holds the attacking edge with 1.2 goals per match versus Napredak's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, AGF is far superior, conceding just 0.8 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Napredak leaks 2.4 per match.

AGF has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

AGF emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (52.9 vs 25.8) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AGF

AGF

VS
Napredak

Napredak

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more